Villegas v. Swarthout et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/15/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall promptly seek additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the court once such information is ascertained.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE LEON VILLEGAS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:13-cv-0168-CMK-P Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 8, 2016, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the 19 complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Peterson was returned unexecuted 20 because defendant is retired. Plaintiff must provide additional information to serve this 21 defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the California 22 Public Records Act, Cal. Gov't. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If 23 access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial 24 intervention. Once additional information sufficient to effect service is obtained, plaintiff shall 25 notify the court whereupon plaintiff will be forwarded the forms necessary for service by the U.S. 26 Marshal. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to effect service may result in the dismissal of 1 1 2 unserved defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall promptly seek 3 additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the court 4 once such information is ascertained. 5 6 7 8 DATED: November 15, 2016 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?