Cha v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/15/2013 13 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Mee Cha ORDERING defendant shall, no later than 9/18/2013, file an amended court transcript index, specifically itemizing the records contained in the administrative transcript. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEE CHA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-0179 CKD v. ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. The administrative transcript does not 18 19 contain an itemized list of the exhibits. The “List of Exhibits” simply lumps all of the “medical 20 evidence” and indicates such evidence is found at pages 225-449 of the administrative transcript. 21 Similarly, the “disability related development and documentation” indicates this evidence can be 22 found at pages 104-224. Compiling all the evidence in such a manner, without specific 23 itemization of the records found therein, does not foster meaningful review. Such a practice is 24 also contrary to the thousands of administrative transcripts heretofore submitted to this court. 25 See, e.g., court transcript indices submitted in Smith v. SS, (E.D. Cal.), case no. 2:12-cv-2707 26 CKD; Jekov v. SS, (E.D. Cal.), case no. 2:12-cv-2768 CKD. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant shall, no later than September 2 18, 2013, file an amended court transcript index, specifically itemizing the records contained in 3 the administrative transcript. 4 Dated: August 15, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 4 cha0179.index 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?