Cha v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/2/14 ORDERING that the 4/22/14 order concerning EAJA fees is withdrawn. The defendant shall pay plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA in accordance with this stipulation. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB# 103726
5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1
Carmichael, CA
95608
(916) 488-3030
(916) 489-9297 fax
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
MEE CHA
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
-O0O0O-
9
10
11
MEE CHA,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
Carolyn Colvin,
15
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-CV-00179-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER
APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
[28 U.S.C. §2412(d)]
SECURITY,
17
Defendant
18
19
20
THE PARTIES STIPULATE through their undersigned counsel
21
that the Court’s order of April 22, 2014, granting plaintiff’s
22
motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act
23
may be withdrawn and this stipulation and order substituted
24
therefor.
25
26
27
28
THE PARTIES STIPULATE through the undersigned,
subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff be awarded
STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
[28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 1
1
attorney fees in the amount of Four Thousand Six Hundred Dollars
2
($4,600.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C.
3
§2412(d) and that there will be no award of costs. This will
4
5
represent compensation for all legal services rendered by
6
counsel for plaintiff in this civil action and in accordance
7
with that statute.
8
9
Upon the Court’s order, defendant will consider
the assignment of those EAJA fees pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff,
10
11
130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), considering any offsets
12
allowed under the United States Department of Treasury’s Offset
13
Program. Fees shall be made payable to plaintiff, but if the
14
Treasury Department determines plaintiff owes no federal debt,
15
then the government shall pay the fees directly to Jesse S.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Kaplan based on an assignment executed by plaintiff and will
deliver the payment to said counsel.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise
settlement of plaintiff’s request for EAJA fees and not an
admission of liability of defendant under the EAJA. Payment of
22
23
this agreed amount shall constitute a complete release and bar
24
of plaintiff and her counsel regarding EAJA fees relating to
25
this action. This award is without prejudice to plaintiff’s
26
counsel’s right to fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the
27
28
savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
[28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 2
1
Dated:
April 29, 2014
/s/
2
Jesse S. Kaplan
JESSE S. KAPLAN
3
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
6
Dated: April 29, 2014
/s/ per email authorization
7
JEFFREY CHEN
8
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
9
Attorney for Defendant
10
11
ORDER
12
13
14
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING from the foregoing stipulation, the
Court’s Order of April 22, 2014, concerning EAJA fees is
15
16
17
withdrawn, and IT IS ORDERED that defendant pay plaintiff’s
attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA in accordance with this
18
stipulation.
19
Dated:
May 2, 2014
20
21
22
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
[28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?