Cha v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/2/14 ORDERING that the 4/22/14 order concerning EAJA fees is withdrawn. The defendant shall pay plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA in accordance with this stipulation. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB# 103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 (916) 488-3030 (916) 489-9297 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff MEE CHA 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 -O0O0O- 9 10 11 MEE CHA, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. Carolyn Colvin, 15 ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:13-CV-00179-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT [28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] SECURITY, 17 Defendant 18 19 20 THE PARTIES STIPULATE through their undersigned counsel 21 that the Court’s order of April 22, 2014, granting plaintiff’s 22 motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act 23 may be withdrawn and this stipulation and order substituted 24 therefor. 25 26 27 28 THE PARTIES STIPULATE through the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff be awarded STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT [28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 1 1 attorney fees in the amount of Four Thousand Six Hundred Dollars 2 ($4,600.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 3 §2412(d) and that there will be no award of costs. This will 4 5 represent compensation for all legal services rendered by 6 counsel for plaintiff in this civil action and in accordance 7 with that statute. 8 9 Upon the Court’s order, defendant will consider the assignment of those EAJA fees pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 10 11 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), considering any offsets 12 allowed under the United States Department of Treasury’s Offset 13 Program. Fees shall be made payable to plaintiff, but if the 14 Treasury Department determines plaintiff owes no federal debt, 15 then the government shall pay the fees directly to Jesse S. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Kaplan based on an assignment executed by plaintiff and will deliver the payment to said counsel. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of plaintiff’s request for EAJA fees and not an admission of liability of defendant under the EAJA. Payment of 22 23 this agreed amount shall constitute a complete release and bar 24 of plaintiff and her counsel regarding EAJA fees relating to 25 this action. This award is without prejudice to plaintiff’s 26 counsel’s right to fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the 27 28 savings clause provisions of the EAJA. STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT [28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 2 1 Dated: April 29, 2014 /s/ 2 Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN 3 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 Dated: April 29, 2014 /s/ per email authorization 7 JEFFREY CHEN 8 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 9 Attorney for Defendant 10 11 ORDER 12 13 14 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING from the foregoing stipulation, the Court’s Order of April 22, 2014, concerning EAJA fees is 15 16 17 withdrawn, and IT IS ORDERED that defendant pay plaintiff’s attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA in accordance with this 18 stipulation. 19 Dated: May 2, 2014 20 21 22 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT [28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?