Shellabarger et al v. Dicharry et al
Filing
63
STIPULATION and ORDER 62 vacating all dates signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/13/2015. Parties are ordered to file Joint Scheduling Conference Statment within 30 days of resolution of pending Motions. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON, ESQ., SB No. 245199
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
Attorneys at Law
601 University Avenue, Suite 150
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 564-6100
Telecopier: (916) 564-6263
5
Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN HALE, CITY OF RED BLUFF, and RAY MARTINEZ
6
COREY A. EVANS, SBN 218789
EVANS & PAGE
2912 Diamond St., Suite 346
San Francisco, CA 94131
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
LEONARD G. KRUP, ESQ. SBN 49572
510 West Wood Street
Willows, CA 95988
(530) 798-5022
Attorney for Defendant DARREN DICHARRY
DENNIS HALSEY, ESQ. SBN 66091
Law Office of Dennis Halsey
9 Highland Circle
Chico, CA 95926
(530) 345-1976
Attorney for Defendant DARREN DICHARRY
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JENEANE SHELLABARGER; and
KENNETH POTTER,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DARRIN DICHARRY; KEVIN HALE; RAY )
MARTINEZ; CITY OF RED BLUFF; and
)
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.: 13-cv-00188-TLN-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
VACATE DATES
Trial Date: August 17, 2015
Honorable Troy L. Nunley
28
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES
1
The parties filed a stipulation and order to continue the pretrial conference deadlines on
2
June 5, 2015, and the court signed the order on June 11, 2015. For the following reasons, the
3
parties hereby request that this Court vacate the upcoming dates and deadlines until certain
4
pending motions are resolved.
Whereas, Defendant Darren Dicharry’s motion for summary judgment was taken under
5
6
submission on February 6, 2015;
7
Whereas, the pending motion for summary judgment raises qualified immunity on behalf
8
of Defendant Dicharry and seeks dismissal of the only cause of action pled against Dicharry, the
9
granting of this motion would result in dismissal of Defendant Dicharry from this case;
Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant Dicharry’s Motion to Change Time to modify the
10
11
deadline to disclose expert witnesses was taken under submission on January 23, 2015;
Whereas the Court’s order on the motion for summary judgment and the Motion to
12
13
Change Time are still pending;
14
Whereas under the current schedule the parties joint pretrial statement is due July 9, 2015
15
and the pretrial conference is scheduled for July 16, 2015; the trial date is set for August 17,
16
2015.
17
Therefore the parties have stipulated as follows:
18
In light of the pending motion for summary judgment and the Motion to Change Time,
19
the parties request that all pending dates be vacated and the parties agree to file a joint
20
scheduling conference statement within 30 days of the resolution of the pending motions, said
21
statement would outline the parties’ availability for trial and hearings.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
Dated: July 8, 2015
ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP
25
26
27
28
By:_/s/ Carrie A. Frederickson
CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON
Attorneys for Defendants
KEVIN HALE, RAY MARTINEZ, and
CITY OF RED BLUFF
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES
1
Dated: July 8, 2015
EVANS & PAGE
2
By:_/s/ Corey A. Evans (as Authorized on
7/9/15)
COREY EVANS
Attorney for Plaintiffs JENEANE
SHELLABARGER and KENNETH
POTTER
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: July 8, 2015
8
By: /s/ Dennis Halsey (as authorized on
7/9/15)
LEONARD G. KRUP
DENNIS HALSEY
Attorneys for Defendant DARREN
DICHARRY
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
It is so ordered.
All dates are hereby vacated, including the trial date, and the parties are ordered to
22
file a joint scheduling conference statement within 30 days of the resolution of the pending
23
motions.
24
25
Dated: July 13, 2015
26
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?