Shellabarger et al v. Dicharry et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER 62 vacating all dates signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/13/2015. Parties are ordered to file Joint Scheduling Conference Statment within 30 days of resolution of pending Motions. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON, ESQ., SB No. 245199 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP Attorneys at Law 601 University Avenue, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 564-6100 Telecopier: (916) 564-6263 5 Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN HALE, CITY OF RED BLUFF, and RAY MARTINEZ 6 COREY A. EVANS, SBN 218789 EVANS & PAGE 2912 Diamond St., Suite 346 San Francisco, CA 94131 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LEONARD G. KRUP, ESQ. SBN 49572 510 West Wood Street Willows, CA 95988 (530) 798-5022 Attorney for Defendant DARREN DICHARRY DENNIS HALSEY, ESQ. SBN 66091 Law Office of Dennis Halsey 9 Highland Circle Chico, CA 95926 (530) 345-1976 Attorney for Defendant DARREN DICHARRY 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JENEANE SHELLABARGER; and KENNETH POTTER, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) DARRIN DICHARRY; KEVIN HALE; RAY ) MARTINEZ; CITY OF RED BLUFF; and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 13-cv-00188-TLN-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES Trial Date: August 17, 2015 Honorable Troy L. Nunley 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES 1 The parties filed a stipulation and order to continue the pretrial conference deadlines on 2 June 5, 2015, and the court signed the order on June 11, 2015. For the following reasons, the 3 parties hereby request that this Court vacate the upcoming dates and deadlines until certain 4 pending motions are resolved. Whereas, Defendant Darren Dicharry’s motion for summary judgment was taken under 5 6 submission on February 6, 2015; 7 Whereas, the pending motion for summary judgment raises qualified immunity on behalf 8 of Defendant Dicharry and seeks dismissal of the only cause of action pled against Dicharry, the 9 granting of this motion would result in dismissal of Defendant Dicharry from this case; Whereas Plaintiff and Defendant Dicharry’s Motion to Change Time to modify the 10 11 deadline to disclose expert witnesses was taken under submission on January 23, 2015; Whereas the Court’s order on the motion for summary judgment and the Motion to 12 13 Change Time are still pending; 14 Whereas under the current schedule the parties joint pretrial statement is due July 9, 2015 15 and the pretrial conference is scheduled for July 16, 2015; the trial date is set for August 17, 16 2015. 17 Therefore the parties have stipulated as follows: 18 In light of the pending motion for summary judgment and the Motion to Change Time, 19 the parties request that all pending dates be vacated and the parties agree to file a joint 20 scheduling conference statement within 30 days of the resolution of the pending motions, said 21 statement would outline the parties’ availability for trial and hearings. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 Dated: July 8, 2015 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP 25 26 27 28 By:_/s/ Carrie A. Frederickson CARRIE A. FREDERICKSON Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN HALE, RAY MARTINEZ, and CITY OF RED BLUFF -2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES 1 Dated: July 8, 2015 EVANS & PAGE 2 By:_/s/ Corey A. Evans (as Authorized on 7/9/15) COREY EVANS Attorney for Plaintiffs JENEANE SHELLABARGER and KENNETH POTTER 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: July 8, 2015 8 By: /s/ Dennis Halsey (as authorized on 7/9/15) LEONARD G. KRUP DENNIS HALSEY Attorneys for Defendant DARREN DICHARRY 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 It is so ordered. All dates are hereby vacated, including the trial date, and the parties are ordered to 22 file a joint scheduling conference statement within 30 days of the resolution of the pending 23 motions. 24 25 Dated: July 13, 2015 26 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 -3- STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE DATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?