Benyamini v. Blackburn et al

Filing 115

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/4/2017 DENYING 113 Motion to Supplement and DENYING 114 Motion Requesting Service of Subpoenas. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT BENYAMINI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P v. ORDER M. BLACKBURN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting service of subpoenas upon defendants in 18 preparation for trial (ECF No. 114) and a motion to supplement the motion with copies of the 19 subpoenas (ECF No. 113). The motion to supplement will be denied because the court is in possession of the 20 21 subpoenas and finds no reason to file them in this case. Upon review of the subpoenas, the 22 motion for court ordered service of the subpoenas will also be denied. The subpoenas submitted 23 by plaintiff seek to obtain the mental health records for defendants Marzan and Blackburn. Not 24 only does plaintiff fail to establish that the requested records are sufficiently relevant to this 25 action to warrant the disclose of such sensitive information, but discovery in this case has been 26 closed for nearly three years (see ECF No. 44 (granting final extension of discovery deadline)). 27 Plaintiff may not evade this deadline through the use of supboenas. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion requesting service of 2 subpoenas (ECF No. 114) and motion to supplement (ECF No. 113) are DENIED. 3 DATED: October 4, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?