Benyamini v. Blackburn et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/09/15 ordering plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 53 is granted. Plaintiff is granted an extension of 60 days to file and serve his opposition to the defendants' motion for summary judgment up to 4/14/15. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel 53 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P

v.

ORDER

M. BLACKBURN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

17
18

rights action, seeks an extension of time and appointment of counsel. ECF No. 53.
Plaintiff has filed a timely second request for an extension of time to file and serve an

19
20

opposition to defendants’ November 26, 2014 motion for summary judgment. The current

21

deadline was on February 13, 2015. ECF No. 52. Plaintiff seeks an additional sixty days to file

22

his response. ECF No. 53 at 5. Good cause appearing, the motion will be granted nunc pro tunc.
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require

23
24

counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490

25

U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the

26

voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d

27

1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

28

////
1

1

The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s

2

likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in

3

light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328,

4

1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances

5

common to most pro se plaintiffs, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access,

6

do not establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance

7

of counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.

8

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

9

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 53) is granted; and

10
11
12

2. Plaintiff is granted an extension of sixty days to file and serve his opposition to the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment, up to April 14, 2015.
3. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 53) is denied without

13

prejudice.

14

DATED: March 9, 2015

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2