Benyamini v. Blackburn et al

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/1/15 ORDERING that within 14 days of the filing of this order, the parties must each complete and file the attached notices.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

M. BLACKBURN, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

18

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was

19

denied (ECF No. 74) and this case is ready to proceed to trial. However, before pretrial and trial

20

dates are set, the parties will be required to complete the attached notices and file them with the

21

court regarding whether they believe a settlement conference would be beneficial in this case.

22

The court notes that plaintiff currently has five other active civil rights cases against

23

corrections staff in various stages of litigation pending in this district: (1) Benyamini v. O’Brian,

24

2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P; (2) Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P; (3) Benyamini v.

25

Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P; (4) Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P; and (5)

26

Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P. If defendants believe that a settlement

27

conference in this case would be beneficial, counsel for defendants should consult with the

28

appropriate individuals within the Attorney General’s Office and the California Department of
1

1

Corrections and Rehabilitation to determine whether they would like the settlement conference to

2

attempt to resolve any or all of plaintiff’s other cases. If appropriate, the parties should identify

3

which, if any, of plaintiff’s other cases they would like to attempt to resolve during a settlement

4

conference in this case. Further orders will issue once both parties have filed their notices with

5

the court.

6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the filing of this

7

order, the parties must each complete and file the attached notices.

8

DATED: December 1, 2015

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P

v.

NOTICE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

M. BLACKBURN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Check one:
Yes, plaintiff believes that a settlement conference in this case would be beneficial.

18
19

No, plaintiff does not believe that a settlement conference in this case would be beneficial.

20
21

If you answered yes, please check which, if any, of the following cases you would also

22
23

like to attempt to resolve during a settlement conference in this case:

24

Benyamini v. O’Brian, 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P

25

Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P

26

Benyamini v. Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P

27

////

28

////
3

1

Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P

2

Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P

3
4
5
6

DATED:_______________________
______________________________________
ROBERT BENYAMINI
Plaintiff pro se

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0205 MCE AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

M. BLACKBURN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Check one:

18

Yes, defendants Blackburn and Marzan believe that a settlement conference in this case

19

would be beneficial.

20
21

No, defendants Blackburn and Marzan do not believe that a settlement conference in this

22

case would be beneficial.

23
24
25

If you answered yes, please check which, if any, of the following cases you would also
like to attempt to resolve during a settlement conference in this case:

26

Benyamini v. O’Brian, 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P

27

Benyamini v. Swett, 2:13-cv-0735 KJM EFB P

28

Benyamini v. Vance, 2:13-cv-0910 TLN AC P
5

1

Benyamini v. Minton, 2:13-cv-1632 JAM AC P

2

Benyamini v. Agnone, 2:15-cv-1223 TLN KJN P

3
4
5
6

DATED:_______________________
______________________________________
Attorney for defendants Blackburn and Marzan

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6