Robben v. Justin, et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 8/2/13, ORDERING that defendant Jeff Robben (only) is dismissed with prejudice from this action. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 David P. Foos (SBN: 83430) LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES A Professional Corporation 3841 North Freeway Boulevard, Suite 185 Sacramento, CA 95834 T: (916) 923-2800 F: (916) 923-2828 E-mail: dfoos@bowmanandassoc.com Attorney for Plaintiff JEFF ROBBEN 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SACRAMENTO DIVISION LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185 SACRAMENTO, CA 95834 10 11 12 CASE NO: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD TODD ROBBEN, Plaintiffs, v. 13 14 15 16 17 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER Richard Justin, Dennis Justin, Individually, Bail Bonds, Inc. (BBI) of Fallon, Nevada, a Nevada Corporation Nevada DBA Justin Brothers Bail Bonds, and Jeff Robben, Individually, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 And related Counterclaim. WHEREAS Plaintiff TODD ROBBEN and Defendant JEFF ROBBEN agree that all claims in the above-captioned proceeding have been fully settled and compromised; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their 23 undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 24 as to Defendant JEFF ROBBEN pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1); 25 26 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fee and costs of suit. 27 28 Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al. Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD 1 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that the parties mutually and 1 2 fully release and forever discharge each other and their attorneys from any and all actions, suits, 3 demands, debts, expenses, accounts, reckonings, obligations, costs, rights, agreements, promises, 4 5 6 liabilities, liens, damages, or causes of action that may stem from any of the facts or causes of actions alleged in this lawsuit including, but not limited to, any and all claims, including any 7 common law claims, debts, liabilities, demands, damages, charges, promises, acts, agreements, 8 claims for negligence or attorney malpractice, costs and expenses (including any claim for 9 attorneys' fees), actions and causes of action, or any claim for violation of civil rights, or of any LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185 SACRAMENTO, CA 95834 10 other state or federal statute or constitution. This Release extends to the parties TODD 11 12 ROBBEN and JEFF ROBBEN in all capacities. 13 14 Dated: 15 By: /s/ Jeff Robben JEFF ROBBEN, Defendant 16 17 18 Dated: 19 LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 20 21 By: /s/ David P. Foos 22 David P. Foos, Esq. 23 Attorney for Defendant, JEFF ROBBEN 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al. Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD 2 1 Dated: By: /s/ Todd Robben 2 TODD ROBBEN, Plaintiff 3 4 5 Dated: ENGEL LAW GROUP 6 By: /s/ Julius Engel 7 Julius Engel, Esq. 8 Attorney for Plaintiff, TODD ROBBEN 9 LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC 3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185 SACRAMENTO, CA 95834 10 11 ORDER 12 13 In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders the above-captioned action be 14 DISMISSED with prejudice, as to Defendant JEFF ROBBEN only. Each party to this action 15 shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 2, 2013 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al. Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?