Robben v. Justin, et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 8/2/13, ORDERING that defendant Jeff Robben (only) is dismissed with prejudice from this action. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
David P. Foos (SBN: 83430)
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES
A Professional Corporation
3841 North Freeway Boulevard, Suite 185
Sacramento, CA 95834
T: (916) 923-2800
F: (916) 923-2828
E-mail: dfoos@bowmanandassoc.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
JEFF ROBBEN
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SACRAMENTO DIVISION
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
10
11
12
CASE NO: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD
TODD ROBBEN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
13
14
15
16
17
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;
ORDER
Richard Justin, Dennis Justin, Individually,
Bail Bonds, Inc. (BBI) of Fallon, Nevada, a
Nevada Corporation Nevada DBA Justin
Brothers Bail Bonds, and Jeff Robben,
Individually,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
And related Counterclaim.
WHEREAS Plaintiff TODD ROBBEN and Defendant JEFF ROBBEN agree that all
claims in the above-captioned proceeding have been fully settled and compromised;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their
23
undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice
24
as to Defendant JEFF ROBBEN pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1);
25
26
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that each party shall bear its
own attorneys’ fee and costs of suit.
27
28
Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al.
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD
1
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties that the parties mutually and
1
2
fully release and forever discharge each other and their attorneys from any and all actions, suits,
3
demands, debts, expenses, accounts, reckonings, obligations, costs, rights, agreements, promises,
4
5
6
liabilities, liens, damages, or causes of action that may stem from any of the facts or causes of
actions alleged in this lawsuit including, but not limited to, any and all claims, including any
7
common law claims, debts, liabilities, demands, damages, charges, promises, acts, agreements,
8
claims for negligence or attorney malpractice, costs and expenses (including any claim for
9
attorneys' fees), actions and causes of action, or any claim for violation of civil rights, or of any
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
10
other state or federal statute or constitution. This Release extends to the parties TODD
11
12
ROBBEN and JEFF ROBBEN in all capacities.
13
14
Dated:
15
By: /s/ Jeff Robben
JEFF ROBBEN, Defendant
16
17
18
Dated:
19
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN &
ASSOCIATES, APC
20
21
By: /s/ David P. Foos
22
David P. Foos, Esq.
23
Attorney for Defendant, JEFF ROBBEN
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al.
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD
2
1
Dated:
By: /s/ Todd Robben
2
TODD ROBBEN, Plaintiff
3
4
5
Dated:
ENGEL LAW GROUP
6
By: /s/ Julius Engel
7
Julius Engel, Esq.
8
Attorney for Plaintiff, TODD ROBBEN
9
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
3841 NORTH FREEWAY BLVD., STE. 185
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
10
11
ORDER
12
13
In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders the above-captioned action be
14
DISMISSED with prejudice, as to Defendant JEFF ROBBEN only. Each party to this action
15
shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 2, 2013
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Todd Robben v. Richard Justin, et al.
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
U.S. District Court-Eastern Case No.: 2:13-CV-00238-MCE-DAD
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?