McClintock v. Colosimo, et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/7/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants Roberts and Lara are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; and this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for the issuance of an order directing service of the amended complaint on defendants Colosimo, Beshears, Meriweather, and Casillas. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN MCCLINTOCK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0264-TLN-DAD P
v.
ORDER
COLOSIMO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2014 (ECF No. 17) are adopted in
27
28
full;
1
1
2. Defendants Roberts and Lara are dismissed from this action without prejudice; and
2
3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for the issuance of an order directing
3
service of the amended complaint on defendants Colosimo, Beshears, Meriweather, and Casillas.
4
Dated: March 7, 2014
5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?