McClintock v. Colosimo, et al

Filing 74

ORDER adopting 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 65 Motion for terminating sanctions or alternatively, evidentiary sanctions signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/22/16. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN MCCLINTOCK,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0264 TLN AC P (TEMP)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

COLOSIMO et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On January 27, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 72.) Neither

23

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2016, are adopted in full;

28

2. Defendants’ motion for terminating sanctions or alternatively, evidentiary sanctions
1

1

(ECF. No. 65) is denied.

2

Dated: March 22, 2016

3

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2