Kalani v. Federico et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/24/14 re 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Highway 88's 10 Cross-Complaint against Federico is not dismissed. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Robert Kalani

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT KALANI,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
ERNEST A. FEDERICO, dba PERKO’S
CAFE; HIGHWAY 88 AND 99 LAND
COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;

16

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

22
23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
///
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendant

2

Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko’s Café ("Federico") and Defendant Highway 88 and 99 Land

3

Company, a limited partnership ("Highway 88"), the parties to this action, by and through their

4

respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that Plaintiff's

5

Complaint in above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is

6

to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Highway 88's Cross-Complaint against Federico will

7

not be dismissed.

8
9

Date: June 18, 2014

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

10
11

/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Robert Kalani

12
13
14

Date: June 18, 2014

MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES

15
/s/ Michael D. Welch
Michael D. Welch
Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant
Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko’s Cafe

16
17
18
19

Date: June 18, 2014

JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER
& MITCHELL LLP

20
21

/s/ Martin H. Orlick
Martin H. Orlick
Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant
Highway 88 and 99 Land Company,
a limited partnership

22
23
24
25
26

///

27

///

28

///
///
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1
ORDER

2
3
4
5
6
7

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action be dismissed with
prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. Highway 88's
Cross-Complaint against Federico is not dismissed.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 24, 2014

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3