Kalani v. Federico et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/24/14 re 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Highway 88's 10 Cross-Complaint against Federico is not dismissed. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Kalani 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT KALANI, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. ERNEST A. FEDERICO, dba PERKO’S CAFE; HIGHWAY 88 AND 99 LAND COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /// STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendant 2 Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko’s Café ("Federico") and Defendant Highway 88 and 99 Land 3 Company, a limited partnership ("Highway 88"), the parties to this action, by and through their 4 respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that Plaintiff's 5 Complaint in above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is 6 to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Highway 88's Cross-Complaint against Federico will 7 not be dismissed. 8 9 Date: June 18, 2014 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 10 11 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Kalani 12 13 14 Date: June 18, 2014 MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES 15 /s/ Michael D. Welch Michael D. Welch Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko’s Cafe 16 17 18 19 Date: June 18, 2014 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP 20 21 /s/ Martin H. Orlick Martin H. Orlick Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant Highway 88 and 99 Land Company, a limited partnership 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /// STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 The parties having so stipulated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. Highway 88's Cross-Complaint against Federico is not dismissed. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2014 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?