Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.

Filing 170

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/2020 CONTINUING the Examination from 6/25/2020 to 8/27/2020 at 10:00 a.m. The Examinee shall appear via video conference (Zoom) as the Court may instruct or direct, for the Examination in Courtroom 25 of this Court on 8/27/2020 at 10:00 a.m., unless the Parties stipulate to a further continuance prior to that date. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 Thomas W. Barth, SBN 154075 2 2810 Fifth Street Davis, California 95618 Telephone: (916) 440-8600 Facsimile: (916) 440-9610 Email: tbarth@barth-daly.com 3 4 5 6 BARTH DALY LLP Attorneys for HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC., HYNES CHILDREN TF LIMITED and MICHAEL HYNES 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a California corporation; DAN FOLK, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. No. 2:13-CV-00288-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER (1) TO FILE SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT AND (2) CONTINUING EXAMINATION OF DANIEL M. FOLK 14 15 16 HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC., dba HYNES AVIATION SERVICES, HYNES CHILDREN TF LIMITED; MICHAEL K. HYNES, 17 Current Examination Date: Date: June 25, 2020 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 25 Defendants. 18 19 HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation; MICHAEL K. HYNES, an individual, 20 Proposed Examination Date: Date: August 27, 2020 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 25 Counter-Claimants, 21 v. 22 23 SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a California corporation; DAN FOLK, an individual, 24 Counter-Defendants. 25 This Stipulation and Order (1) To File Second Amended Judgment and 26 27 (2) Continuation of the Examination of Daniel Folk is entered into by and among defendants, 28 cross-complainants and judgment creditors Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., Hynes Children TF {00030932} STIP & ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT AND CONTINUATION OF DEBTOR EXAM 2:13-CV-288-KJN 1 Limited and Michael Hynes ("Judgment Creditor"), on the one hand and plaintiff, cross-defendant 2 and judgment debtor Sacramento E.D.M., Inc. and Daniel M. Folk (the "Examinee") on the other 3 hand (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the 4 following facts: 5 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed on a form of the Second Amended Judgment, 6 to clarify and correct the allocation of restitution ordered concerning the US Banc judgment, as 7 detailed in the proposed Second Amended Judgment, filed concurrently herewith; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on March 9, 2020, Judgment Creditor filed an application for an order requiring Examinee to appear for examination pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 708.110 (the "Application"); 11 WHEREAS, on March 16, 2020, the Court entered an order granting the 12 Application, pursuant to which the Examinee was required to appear at the Court on May 11, 13 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 25 for an examination pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 14 Section 708.110 (the "Examination"); 15 16 WHEREAS, the Examination was continued by Minute Order of the Court on May 5, 2020, to June 11, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 25; 17 18 WHEREAS, the Examination was continued by Minute Order of the Court on May 6, 2020, to June 25, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 25; 19 WHEREAS the Examinee and the Judgment Creditor have agreed to reschedule 20 the Examination in order to accommodate the discussion and exchange of information and 21 settlement efforts by the parties, subject to the terms and conditions of the proposed order; 22 WHEREAS the Parties have agreed, subject to Court approval and without further 23 notice, to continue the Examination from June 25, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. to August 27, 2020 at 24 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the Court may designate; and 25 26 WHEREAS, this Stipulation is not entered into and the Proposed Order is not sought for any improper purpose. 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, agree and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order that: {00030932} -2- STIP & ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT AND CONTINUATION OF DEBTOR EXAM 2:13-CV-288-KJN 1 2 The Second Amended Judgment be signed and filed by the Court as the Second Amended Judgment. 3 4 The Examination is continued from June 25, 2020 to August 27, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. 5 The Examinee shall appear via video conference (Zoom) as the Court may instruct 6 or direct, for the Examination in Courtroom 25 of this Court on August 27, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., 7 unless the Parties stipulate to a further continuance prior to that date. No further notice of the 8 Examination shall be required. 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 22, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 11 BARTH DALY LLP 12 By 13 Attorneys for Judgment Creditors HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC., HYNES CHILDREN TF LIMITED and MICHAEL HYNES 14 15 16 /s/Thomas W. Barth THOMAS W. BARTH Dated: June 22, 2020 17 BRIAN R. KATZ, Attorney at Law By 18 /s/Brian R. Katz BRIAN R. KATZ Attorneys for Judgment Debtors SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC. AND DANIEL FOLK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00030932} -3- STIP & ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT AND CONTINUATION OF DEBTOR EXAM 2:13-CV-288-KJN 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 4 (1) 5 The Second Amended Judgment be signed and filed by the Court as the Second Amended Judgment. (2) 6 The Examination of Daniel M. Folk pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 7 Section 708.110 is continued from June 25, 2020, to August 27, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in 8 Courtroom 25 of the above-entitled Court. Daniel M. Folk shall appear via video conference 9 (Zoom) as the Court may instruct or direct for the Examination on August 27, 2020, unless the 10 Parties stipulate to a further continuance prior to that date. 11 (3) 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 No further notice of the Examination shall be required. Dated: June 24, 2020 14 15 Jr/288.edm 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00030932} -4- STIP & ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED JUDGMENT AND CONTINUATION OF DEBTOR EXAM 2:13-CV-288-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?