Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.

Filing 72

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on September 3, 2014 GRANTING the parties' request 71 to extend time to depose Defendant MICHAEL K. HYNES and Defendant HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. The deadline for Plaintiff to depose MICHAEL K. HYNES and Defendant HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. will now be Friday, October 17, 2014.(Rivas, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Sean Gavin, (SBN: 251124)
FOOS GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.
3947 Lennane Drive, Suite 120
Sacramento, California 95834
T: 916.779.3500
F: 916.779.3508
E: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC. and
DAN FOLK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
2151 River Plaza Drive, Suite 105
Sacramento, CA 95833

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a
California corporation; DAN FOLK, an
individual,

Case No.: 2:13-CV-00288-MCE-KJN

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
DEPOSE DEFENDANTS;
ORDER

v.

[2nd Request]

HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES,
INC. dba HYNES AVIATION
SERVICES, an Oklahoma corporation;
HYNES CHILDREN TF LIMITED, a
business entity, form unknown;
MICHAEL K. HYNES, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive;
Defendant.

WHEREAS, the Court’s original Pretrial Scheduling Order in this matter (Docket
#34) dictated a discovery cutoff date of July 15, 2014; and
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2014 the Parties submitted a Stipulation to Extend Time

24

to Depose Defendants (see Docket #47), which this Court signed on July 24, 2014 (see

25

Docket #58) setting the new deadline to conduct Defendants’ depositions as August 29,

26

2014; and

27
28

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs scheduled Defendants’ depositions for August 13, 2014 and
August 14, 2014 by deposition notices served on July 22 and July 23, 2014; and
Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.
Stipulation to Extend Time to Depose Defendants; Order

Page 1 of 3

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion for Protective Order

1
2

to require that Defendants’ depositions be taken in Missouri (see Docket #63); and
WHEREAS, as a result of their requested Protective Order, Defendants did not

3
4

appear on the days scheduled for their depositions; and
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order is not

5
6

scheduled to take place until September 4, 2014;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs, SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC. and DAN FOLK

7

(“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. dba HYNES

9

AVIATION SERVICES, an Oklahoma corporation; HYNES CHILDREN TF LIMITED,

10
LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
2151 River Plaza Drive, Suite 105
Sacramento, CA 95833

8

a business entity, form unknown; MICHAEL K. HYNES (“Defendants”), by and through

11

their respective counsel, hereby agree, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend the time

12

for Plaintiff to depose Defendant MICHAEL K. HYNES and Defendant HYNES

13

AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC.’s Person Most Knowledgeable about the subjects

14

identified in the deposition notices originally served on July 22 and July 23, 2014. By

15

stipulation of the parties’ counsel, the deadline for Plaintiff to depose MICHAEL K.

16

HYNES and Defendant HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC.’s Person Most

17

Knowledgeable about the subjects identified in the deposition notices originally served on

18

July 22 and July 23, 2014 will now be Friday, October 17, 2014.
This extension is necessary to give Plaintiffs’ counsel an opportunity to travel to

19
20

Missouri for the deposition(s) (or to give Defendants an opportunity to travel to

21

Sacramento, depending on the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order

22

[Docket # 63]). Defendants agree that this request is reasonable.

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//
Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.
Stipulation to Extend Time to Depose Defendants; Order

Page 2 of 3

1

This stipulation is made and entered into pursuant to the Federal Rules of

2

Civil Procedure, Rule 29(b). This stipulation will not interfere with the time set for

3

completing any other discovery, for hearing a motion, or for trial. Nothing in this

4

stipulation is intended to abridge or extend any obligations or responsibilities

5

articulated in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 30.

6

Respectfully Submitted,

7

FOOS GAVIN LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
9

Date: August 29, 2014

LAW OFFICE OF BOWMAN & ASSOCIATES, APC
2151 River Plaza Drive, Suite 105
Sacramento, CA 95833

10
11

_____/s/ Sean Gavin________________________
Sean Gavin (SBN: 251124)
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC. and DAN FOLK

12
13
14
15

BARTH DALY LLP
Date: August 29, 2014

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

_____/s/ Thomas Barth_______________________
THOMAS W. BARTH (SBN: 154075)
Attorneys for Defendants,
HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC.; HYNES
CHILDREN TF LIMITED; and MICHAEL K.
HYNES
ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2014

23
24
25
26
27
28
Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.
Stipulation to Extend Time to Depose Defendants; Order

Page 3 of 3