Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.
Filing
77
RELATED CASE ORDER relating this case with member case 2:13-cv-01674-JAM-CKD signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/14/14. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a
California corporation; DAN FOLK, an
individual,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
19
HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC.
dba HYNES AVIATION SERVICES, an
Oklahoma corporation; et al.,
Defendants.
HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES,
INC.,
22
23
24
No. 2:13-cv-01674-JAM-CKD
Plaintiff,
20
21
RELATED CASE ORDER
v.
17
18
No. 2:13-cv-00288-MCE-KJN
v.
SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a
California corporation; DAN FOLK, an
individual,
Defendants.
25
The Court received the Notice of Related Cases filed October 14, 2014.
26
Examination of the above-entitled civil actions reveals that these actions are
27
related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve
28
1
1
many of the same defendants and are based on the same or similar claims, the same
2
property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the same questions of law,
3
and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges.
4
Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to affect a
5
substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.
6
The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely
7
has the result that the above-referenced actions are assigned to the same judge; no
8
consolidation of the action is affected. Under the regular practice of this court, related
9
cases are generally assigned to the district judge and magistrate judge to whom the first
10
11
filed action was assigned.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated No. 2:13-cv-01674
12
JAM-CKD, Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc. v. Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al., is
13
reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., and Kendall J. Newman for all further
14
proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only is hereby
15
VACATED. Plaintiff Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc. is ORDERED to re-notice its October
16
9, 2014, Motion for Relief from Dismissal (ECF No. 39) for an available civil law and
17
motions calendar in accordance with the local rules. Henceforth, the caption on
18
documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as Case No. 2:13-cv-01674
19
MCE-KJN.
20
21
22
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate
adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2014
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?