Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/27/15 ORDERING that the Clerk reassign this case to the Honorable Kendall J. Newman. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:13-cv-00288-KJN. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a
California corporation; DAN FOLK,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
No. 2:13-cv-00288-MCE-KJN
ORDER
v.
HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC.
dba HYNES AVIATION SERVICES, an
Oklahoma corporation, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before
19
20
a United States Magistrate Judge as stated in their Joint Status Report (ECF No. 83).
21
See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge
22
assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the
23
magistrate judge.
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-
24
25
captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further
26
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the
2
Honorable Kendall J. Newman. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter
3
filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:13-cv-00288-KJN. All currently
4
scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED.
5
Dated: May 27, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further
12
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
13
Dated: May 27, 2015
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?