Sacramento E.D.M., Inc., et al. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc., et al.

Filing 84

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/27/15 ORDERING that the Clerk reassign this case to the Honorable Kendall J. Newman. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:13-cv-00288-KJN. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SACRAMENTO E.D.M., INC., a California corporation; DAN FOLK, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-00288-MCE-KJN ORDER v. HYNES AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. dba HYNES AVIATION SERVICES, an Oklahoma corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before 19 20 a United States Magistrate Judge as stated in their Joint Status Report (ECF No. 83). 21 See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge 22 assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the 23 magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above- 24 25 captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further 26 proceedings and entry of final judgment. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the 2 Honorable Kendall J. Newman. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter 3 filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:13-cv-00288-KJN. All currently 4 scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. 5 Dated: May 27, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further 12 proceedings and entry of final judgment. 13 Dated: May 27, 2015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?