Weber et al v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
72
STIPULATION and ORDER 71 for continuace of trial-related dates signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/27/2016. The last day to complete Discovery is 7/8/2016. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 8/3/2016. Dispositive Motions cut-off is set 11/3/2016. Joint Final Pre-Trial Statement and Evidentiary / Procedural Motion shall be submitted by 2/2/2017. Trial Briefs now due 4/17/2017. Final Pretrial Conference is RE-SET for 2/9/2017 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial is RE-SCHEDULED for 5/1/2017 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN). (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Andrew A. Bao (SBN 247092)
aabao@wolfewyman.com
Meagan S. Tom (SBN 273489)
mstom@wolfewyman.com
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645
Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502
Telephone: (925) 280-0004
Facsimile: (925) 280-0005
Attorneys for Defendant
PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A.,
as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2
(sued erroneously as “HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.)
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER, Case No.: 2:13-cv-00298 TLN CKD
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL AND TRIALRELATED DATES
v.
PNC BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.;
and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
Current Trial Date: October 17, 2016
Proposed Trial Date: April 17, 2016
Time: TBA
Place: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
18
19
20
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b)(4) and the U.S. District Court,
21
Eastern District of California, Local Civil Rule 83-143, Defendants PNC BANK, N.A. (“PNC”) and
22
HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (sued erroneously as
23
“HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.) (“HSBC”) (collectively “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs THOMAS A.
24
WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER (“Plaintiffs”) (collectively, the “Parties”) herein stipulate for a
25
continuance of the trial date, the pre-trial conference date, and trial-related dates and deadlines in the
26
above-referenced action.
27
28
RECITALS
1.
Trial in this matter is currently set for October 17, 2016, and the pre-trial conference
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL.
2208478.1
1
date is set for August 11, 2016.
2
3
2.
The Parties agree that a continuance of the trial and trial related dates is in the best
interest of justice of all parties because:
4
a)
5
Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on June 18, 2014 (Docket Doc
No. 47) containing entirely new claims for relief;
6
b)
7
Following a Motion to Dismiss, Defendants filed an answer to the Second
Amended Complaint on February 2, 2015 (Docket Doc No. 61);
8
c)
9
Following the death of Plaintiff Belinda Weber, the Parties have been
exploring potential settlement options, including but not limited to, a loan
10
modification review;
11
d)
12
However, the Parties require additional time in order to explore all potential
settlement options;
13
e)
14
There are currently no other parties involved in this litigation, and thus no
parties will be prejudiced by the terms of this stipulation;
15
f)
16
As the pleadings contain new allegations and claims, the Parties will need
additional time to conduct discovery;
17
g)
Unless the trial date and all related trial-related deadlines are continued, the
18
Parties will be without sufficient time to conduct a factual investigation and
19
prepare for trial.
20
3.
The Parties had previously requested a trial continuance on July 22, 2014, at which
21
time the pleadings were not at issue and contained new allegations and claims, necessitating
22
additional time to conduct discovery. A continuance of the trial and trial-related deadlines will not
23
prejudice any of the Parties;
24
25
26
4.
Thus, good cause exists for a continuance of the trial and trial-related dates in this
5.
Whereas, the Parties request a continuance of the following deadlines:
action.
27
July 8, 2015
Last Day to Complete Discovery;
28
August 3, 2015
Disclosure of Expert Witness;
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL.
2208478.1
1
November 4, 2016
Dispositive Motion Cutoff;
2
February 1, 2017
Joint Final Pre-Trial Statements and evidentiary/procedural
3
motions;
4
February 8, 2017
Final Pre-Trial Conference;
5
April 3, 2017
Trial Briefs Due;
6
April 17, 2017
Trial Date.
7
8
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERE STIPULATE TO THE FOREGOING, subject
to this Court’s approval.
9
10
DATED: January 26, 2016
MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP
11
By: /s/ Robin D. Shofner (w/authorization)
ROBIN D. SHOFNER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER
12
13
14
15
DATED: January 26, 2016
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
16
17
18
19
20
By: /s/ Meagan S. Tom (SBN 273489)
ANDREW A. BAO
MEAGAN S. TOM
Attorneys for Defendants
PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A.,
N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust
2007-2 (erroneously sued as “HSBC BANK,
U.S.A., N.A.”)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL.
2208478.1
1
2
3
4
5
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Trial and TrialRelated Dates, and good cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order:
The trial date is continued from October 20, 2016 to May 1, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom
2, 15th Floor, of the above-referenced court. The following deadlines are continued as follows:
6
July 8, 2016
Last Day to Complete Discovery;
7
August 3, 2016
Disclosure of Expert Witness;
8
November 3, 2016
Dispositive Motion Cutoff;
9
February 2, 2017
Joint Final Pre-Trial Statements and evidentiary/procedural
10
motions;
11
April 17, 2017
Trial Briefs Due;
12
February 9, 2017
Final Pre-Trial Conference at 2:00 p.m.
13
May 1, 2017
Trial Date at 9:00 a.m.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: January 27, 2016
18
19
20
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL.
2208478.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?