Weber et al v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 72

STIPULATION and ORDER 71 for continuace of trial-related dates signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/27/2016. The last day to complete Discovery is 7/8/2016. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 8/3/2016. Dispositive Motions cut-off is set 11/3/2016. Joint Final Pre-Trial Statement and Evidentiary / Procedural Motion shall be submitted by 2/2/2017. Trial Briefs now due 4/17/2017. Final Pretrial Conference is RE-SET for 2/9/2017 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial is RE-SCHEDULED for 5/1/2017 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN). (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Andrew A. Bao (SBN 247092) aabao@wolfewyman.com Meagan S. Tom (SBN 273489) mstom@wolfewyman.com WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 645 Walnut Creek, California 94596-3502 Telephone: (925) 280-0004 Facsimile: (925) 280-0005 Attorneys for Defendant PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (sued erroneously as “HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.) 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER, Case No.: 2:13-cv-00298 TLN CKD Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND TRIALRELATED DATES v. PNC BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Current Trial Date: October 17, 2016 Proposed Trial Date: April 17, 2016 Time: TBA Place: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor Hon. Troy L. Nunley 18 19 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b)(4) and the U.S. District Court, 21 Eastern District of California, Local Civil Rule 83-143, Defendants PNC BANK, N.A. (“PNC”) and 22 HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (sued erroneously as 23 “HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.) (“HSBC”) (collectively “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs THOMAS A. 24 WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER (“Plaintiffs”) (collectively, the “Parties”) herein stipulate for a 25 continuance of the trial date, the pre-trial conference date, and trial-related dates and deadlines in the 26 above-referenced action. 27 28 RECITALS 1. Trial in this matter is currently set for October 17, 2016, and the pre-trial conference 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL. 2208478.1 1 date is set for August 11, 2016. 2 3 2. The Parties agree that a continuance of the trial and trial related dates is in the best interest of justice of all parties because: 4 a) 5 Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on June 18, 2014 (Docket Doc No. 47) containing entirely new claims for relief; 6 b) 7 Following a Motion to Dismiss, Defendants filed an answer to the Second Amended Complaint on February 2, 2015 (Docket Doc No. 61); 8 c) 9 Following the death of Plaintiff Belinda Weber, the Parties have been exploring potential settlement options, including but not limited to, a loan 10 modification review; 11 d) 12 However, the Parties require additional time in order to explore all potential settlement options; 13 e) 14 There are currently no other parties involved in this litigation, and thus no parties will be prejudiced by the terms of this stipulation; 15 f) 16 As the pleadings contain new allegations and claims, the Parties will need additional time to conduct discovery; 17 g) Unless the trial date and all related trial-related deadlines are continued, the 18 Parties will be without sufficient time to conduct a factual investigation and 19 prepare for trial. 20 3. The Parties had previously requested a trial continuance on July 22, 2014, at which 21 time the pleadings were not at issue and contained new allegations and claims, necessitating 22 additional time to conduct discovery. A continuance of the trial and trial-related deadlines will not 23 prejudice any of the Parties; 24 25 26 4. Thus, good cause exists for a continuance of the trial and trial-related dates in this 5. Whereas, the Parties request a continuance of the following deadlines: action. 27 July 8, 2015 Last Day to Complete Discovery; 28 August 3, 2015 Disclosure of Expert Witness; 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL. 2208478.1 1 November 4, 2016 Dispositive Motion Cutoff; 2 February 1, 2017 Joint Final Pre-Trial Statements and evidentiary/procedural 3 motions; 4 February 8, 2017 Final Pre-Trial Conference; 5 April 3, 2017 Trial Briefs Due; 6 April 17, 2017 Trial Date. 7 8 NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERE STIPULATE TO THE FOREGOING, subject to this Court’s approval. 9 10 DATED: January 26, 2016 MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP 11 By: /s/ Robin D. Shofner (w/authorization) ROBIN D. SHOFNER Attorneys for Plaintiffs THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER 12 13 14 15 DATED: January 26, 2016 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 16 17 18 19 20 By: /s/ Meagan S. Tom (SBN 273489) ANDREW A. BAO MEAGAN S. TOM Attorneys for Defendants PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (erroneously sued as “HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.”) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL. 2208478.1 1 2 3 4 5 ORDER The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Trial and TrialRelated Dates, and good cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order: The trial date is continued from October 20, 2016 to May 1, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, 15th Floor, of the above-referenced court. The following deadlines are continued as follows: 6 July 8, 2016 Last Day to Complete Discovery; 7 August 3, 2016 Disclosure of Expert Witness; 8 November 3, 2016 Dispositive Motion Cutoff; 9 February 2, 2017 Joint Final Pre-Trial Statements and evidentiary/procedural 10 motions; 11 April 17, 2017 Trial Briefs Due; 12 February 9, 2017 Final Pre-Trial Conference at 2:00 p.m. 13 May 1, 2017 Trial Date at 9:00 a.m. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: January 27, 2016 18 19 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, ET AL. 2208478.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?