Gress v. Smith, et al.

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/26/2014 DISCHARGING the 6/4/14 order to show cause 44 ; GRANTING defendant Dr. Nale an extension of time to file a responsove pleading; and defendant Dr. Nale shall file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint as set forth in this court's order addressing the 6/11/14 stipulation.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL GRESS, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0328 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel. By order filed June 4, 2014, 18 defendant Dr. Boru Nale was ordered to show cause why his default should not be entered. on 19 June 20, 2014, counsel for plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause, along with the 20 declarations of Dr. Boru Nale and Riann Giovacchini, litigation coordinator at Mule Creek State 21 Prison, explaining the confusion over legal representation of Dr. Nale and his failure to timely 22 respond. Good cause appearing, the order to show cause is discharged. Counsel for plaintiff was 23 recently granted leave to file a second amended complaint. Therefore, defendant Dr. Nale shall 24 file a response to the Second Amended Complaint as set forth in this court’s order addressing the 25 June 11, 2014 stipulation. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The June 4, 2014 order to show cause directed to defendant Dr. Boru Nale (ECF No. 28 44) is discharged; 1 1 2 3 2. Defendant Dr. Nale is granted an extension of time in which to file a responsive pleading; and 3. Defendant Dr. Nale shall file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint 4 as set forth in this court’s order addressing the June 11, 2014 stipulation. 5 Dated: June 26, 2014 6 7 /gres0328.dsc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?