Crayon v. Hill et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/09/13 granting 41 Motion for deadline confirmation. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss is due within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES E. CRAYON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2: 13-cv-0350 KJN P

v.

ORDER

RICK HILL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

17
18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 14, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On

19

December 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for deadline confirmation. In this motion, plaintiff

20

states that he received no order from the court regarding the deadline for filing his opposition to

21

defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff requests that the court set a deadline for the filing of his

22

opposition.
The order filed August 16, 2013, referenced the rules for determining filing deadlines.

23
24

(See ECF No. 22 at 3.) Due to plaintiff’s misunderstanding regarding the deadline for filing his

25

opposition, plaintiff is granted thirty days to file his opposition.

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

1.

28

Plaintiff’s motion for deadline confirmation (ECF No. 41) is granted;

////
1

1

2. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of

2

the date of this order.

3

Dated: December 9, 2013

4
5

cr350.ord

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2