McCoy v. Yolo County, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/8/2013 ORDERING that the 5 findings and recommendations are VACATED; and this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOLOMON McCOY, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:13-cv-0374 LKK CKD P vs. YOLO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a Yolo County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights 17 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 5, 2013, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations which 20 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 22 the findings and recommendations. Moreover, while plaintiff’s consent form apparently was 23 filed after the March 5 findings were prepared, plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the 24 undersigned magistrate judge. (Dkt. No. 4.) Accordingly, the undersigned will vacate its 25 findings and recommendations and order this case dismissed for the reason set forth in its March 26 5 findings – specifically, that plaintiff’s claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 1 1 (1994). 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 5, 2013, are vacated; and 4 2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be 5 6 granted. Dated: April 8, 2013 7 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 2/de 11 mcco0374.ord 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?