Colbert v. Leininger, et al.

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/16 ORDERING that defendant Leiningers motion for modification of the discovery and scheduling order (ECF No. 63 ) is granted nunc pro tunc, and defendants November 20, 2015 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 65 ) is deemed timely filed. Defendants motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 68 ) is granted nunc pro tunc, and defendants December 17, 2015 reply (ECF No. 69 ) is deemed timely filed. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GEORGE K. COLBERT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0382 KJM KJN P

v.

ORDER

D. LEININGER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On November 6, 2015, defendant Leininger filed a motion requesting that the dispositive

18

motion deadline be extended until November 20, 2015. (ECF No. 63.) On November 20, 2015,

19

defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff opposed defendant’s

20

summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 67.) On December 10, 2015, defendant requested an

21

additional seven days to file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 68.) Defendant’s reply

22

was filed on December 17, 2015. (ECF No. 69.)

23

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. Defendant Leininger’s motion for modification of the discovery and scheduling order

25

(ECF No. 63) is granted nunc pro tunc, and defendant’s November 20, 2015 motion

26

for summary judgment (ECF No. 65) is deemed timely filed.

27

////

28

////
1

1

2. Defendant’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 68) is granted nunc pro tunc,

2

and defendant’s December 17, 2015 reply (ECF No. 69) is deemed timely filed.

3

Dated: January 4, 2016

4
5
6
7
/colb0382.36.msj+reply

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2