Dodson v. Wendy's International, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/24/2014 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 2 12 Williamsburg Lane Chico, CA 95926 3 Telephone: (530) 895-3252 Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 4 Email: USDCEast@HubsLaw.com 1 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 RAY L. WONG, SBN 84193 JASON M. HORST, SBN 245370 DUANE MORRIS LLP Spear Tower One Market Plaza, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94105-1127 Telephone: (415) 957-3000 Facsimile: (415) 957-3001 Email: jmhorst@duanemorris.com 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 Robert Dodson, 17 Plaintiff, 18 Case No. 2:13-cv-00389-MCE-DAD v. 19 20 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon Wendy’s International, Inc. dba Wendy’s, et al., 21 22 23 Defendants. ______________________________/ 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 1 TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES: 2 Plaintiff, Robert Dodson, and defendant Wendy’s International, Inc., by and 3 through the undersigned attorneys, stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter 4 a dismissal with prejudice in the above-entitled action in its entirety pursuant to Fed. 5 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), with all parties to bear their own respective attorneys’ fees, expert 6 fees and costs. 7 8 Dated: January 21, 2014 9 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD By: 10 /s/ Lynn Hubbard / Lynn Hubbard Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Dodson 11 12 Dated: January 21, 2014 13 By: 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 /s/ Ray L. Wong / Ray L. Wong Jason M. Horst Attorneys for Defendant Wendy’s International, Inc. ORDER 18 19 DUANE MORRIS LLP Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?