Morales v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/13 DIORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADAM ELIAS MORALES,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-00414 DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEP'T, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has consented to
19
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See ECF No. 5.)
20
By order filed October 24, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file
21
an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff
22
has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
24
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
Dated: December 3, 2013
26
27
DAD:4
mora414.fta
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?