Williams v. Paramo
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/20/13 denying 13 Motion for Extension of time. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANK J. WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0417 TLN KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
D. PARAMO,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve an amended petition for writ
18
of habeas corpus with unexhausted claims and a motion for stay and abeyance on unexhausted
19
claims. However, petitioner’s motion was not signed by petitioner, and the motion did not
20
indicate how much additional time petitioner needs. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil
21
Procedure requires all court filings to be signed by the pro se litigant. Accordingly, petitioner’s
22
motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s
23
motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 13) is denied without prejudice.
24
Dated: August 20, 2013
25
26
27
28
will0417.111
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?