Williams v. Paramo
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/21 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANK JAMES WILLIAMS, JR.,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2: 13-cv-0417 TLN KJN P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends
19
that this action be dismissed.
On November 17, 2014, this action was stayed so that petitioner could exhaust his
20
21
unexhausted claims. (ECF No. 31.) Petitioner was ordered to file a status report every 90 days
22
detailing petitioner’s progress in exhausting his unexhausted claims in state courts, and to file a
23
motion to lift the stay of this action within 30 days after the California Supreme Court issues a
24
final order resolving petitioner’s unexhausted claims. Petitioner has not filed a status report.
25
Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed based on petitioner’s
26
failure to file a status report and failure to prosecute this case.
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that
8
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
9
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: November 22, 2021
11
12
13
14
/will0417.sty.fr
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?