Williams v. Paramo

Filing 4

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/17/2013 DIRECTING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

FRANK J. WILLIAMS,

11

Petitioner,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:13-cv-0417 KJN P

D. PARAMO,

14
15
16

ORDER AND
Respondent.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

By order filed April 4, 2013, petitioner was granted thirty days in which to file a

17

petition for writ of habeas corpus, and application to proceed in forma pauperis or the court’s

18

filing fee. Thirty days have now passed, and petitioner has not filed a petition, an application or

19

paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20
21
22
23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed
to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

25

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

26

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
1

1

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

3

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

4

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

DATED: May 17, 2013

6
7

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9

will0417.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2