Scott-George v. PVH Corporation

Filing 103

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/12/2015 GRANTING defendant's #101 Ex Parte Application for extension of time. PVH Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be due 28 days following Court's Order on Class Certification. Plaintiffs' Opposition will be due 14 days after defendant's Motion. Defendant's Reply is due 14 days after plaintiffs' Opposition. Hearing shall be set for first available date following due date of Reply unless hearing date is less than 7 days after Reply is due. In which case, hearing should be set for second available date after Reply is due. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Dean Hansell (Bar No. 93831)
Michelle L. Roberts (Bar No. 292075)
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
PVH Corporation

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12
13

JODI SCOTT-GEORGE, individually and
on behalf of other members of the general
public similarly situated,

14

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16

PVH Corporation, et al., a Delaware
Corporation,

17
18

Defendant.

Case No. 2:13-CV-0441 TLN DAD
ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Filed concurrently with Ex Parte
Application to Extend Defendant PVH
Corp.’s May 14, 2015, Deadline to File
Motion for Summary Judgment;
Declarations of Dean Hansell and Michelle
L. Roberts in Support Thereof]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-

ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

ORDER

2
3

The Court, having considered the Ex Parte Application to Extend Defendant PVH Corp.’s

4

May 14, 2015, Deadline to File Motion for Summary Judgment and the Declarations of Dean

5

Hansell and Michelle L. Roberts, finds good cause to continue the deadline for Defendant’s

6

Motion for Summary Judgment and orders the following:

7
8
9
10

The May 14, 2015, deadline for PVH Corp. to file any Motion for Summary Judgment,
and all associated response and hearing dates, shall be continued as follows:
(1)

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be due 28 days following the

Court’s order on class certification.

11

(2)

Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be due 14 days after Defendant’s Motion is due.

12

(3)

Defendant’s Reply shall be due 14 days after Plaintiff’s Opposition.

13

(4)

The hearing shall be set for the first available hearing date following the due date

14

of the Reply unless the hearing date is less than seven days after the Reply is due, in which case

15

the hearing should be set for the second available hearing date after the Reply is due.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

Dated: May 12, 2015

19
20
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

ORDER EXTENDING PVH CORP.’S
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT