Scott-George v. PVH Corporation
Filing
48
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/31/14 #47 RESETTING Motion for Class Certification Hearing to 1/29/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Dean Hansell (Bar No. 93831)
Asheley G. Dean (Bar No. 245504)
Rachel A. Patta (Bar No. 273968)
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 785-4600
Facsimile: (310) 785-4601
dean.hansell@hoganlovells.com
asheley.dean@hoganlovells.com
rachel.patta@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendants
PVH Corporation
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
JODI SCOTT-GEORGE,
individually and on behalf of other
members of the general public
similarly situated,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
Case No. 2:13-CV-0441
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO RESET HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION
PVH Corporation, et al., a Delaware
Corporation,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
\LA - 039936/000005 - 1097515 v1
1
ORDER
2
Good cause having been shown, based upon the parties’ Stipulation To
3
Reset Hearing Date On Plaintiffs’ Motion For Class Certification, entered into on
4
July 30, 2014 by and between the Plaintiffs JODI SCOTT-GEORGE and
5
MELISSA WIGGS (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant PVH CORPORATION, and
6
based on the documents and records in the above-captioned action, this Court
7
hereby orders as follows:
8
The hearing date reserved for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
9
10
currently set for January 15, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. is reset for hearing on January 29,
11
2015.
12
13
14
Dated: July 31, 2014
15
16
17
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
\LA - 039936/000005 - 1097515 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?