Jones v. Kuppinger et al

Filing 113

ORDER ADOPTING 111 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/17GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART defendant's 101 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: GRANTED to defendants Moore and Kuppin ger on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims; and DENIED as to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against defendant Moore; this action shall proceed against defendant Kuppinger on plaintiff's excessive force claim, and against defendant Moore on plaintiff's failure to protect. Case Referred to VDRP (cc: VDRP). (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HENRY A. JONES, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0451 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. KUPPINGER, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 6, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations, but plaintiff requests that a settlement 23 conference be scheduled. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Additionally, this court finds that 26 a second settlement conference is warranted in this case at this time rather than immediately 27 proceed to pretrial and trial matters. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 6, 2017, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 101, is granted in 3 part as follows: 4 a. Granted to defendants Moore and Kuppinger on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 5 deliberate indifference claims; and 6 b. Denied as to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against 7 defendant Moore. 8 3. As a result, this action shall proceed against defendant Kuppinger on plaintiff’s 9 excessive force claim, and against defendant Moore on plaintiff’s failure to protect claim. 10 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to contact Ms. Sujean Park, this court’s Alternative 11 Dispute Resolution Coordinator, for the purpose of scheduling a mandatory settlement conference 12 in this case at the earliest opportunity. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: October 19, 2017 15 16 17 jone0451.801+sett 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?