Jones v. Kuppinger et al
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING 111 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/17GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART defendant's 101 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: GRANTED to defendants Moore and Kuppin ger on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims; and DENIED as to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against defendant Moore; this action shall proceed against defendant Kuppinger on plaintiff's excessive force claim, and against defendant Moore on plaintiff's failure to protect. Case Referred to VDRP (cc: VDRP). (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
HENRY A. JONES,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0451 WBS AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
P. KUPPINGER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On September 6, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations, but plaintiff requests that a settlement
23
conference be scheduled.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Additionally, this court finds that
26
a second settlement conference is warranted in this case at this time rather than immediately
27
proceed to pretrial and trial matters.
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 6, 2017, are adopted in full;
2
2. Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 101, is granted in
3
part as follows:
4
a. Granted to defendants Moore and Kuppinger on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment
5
deliberate indifference claims; and
6
b. Denied as to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against
7
defendant Moore.
8
3. As a result, this action shall proceed against defendant Kuppinger on plaintiff’s
9
excessive force claim, and against defendant Moore on plaintiff’s failure to protect claim.
10
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to contact Ms. Sujean Park, this court’s Alternative
11
Dispute Resolution Coordinator, for the purpose of scheduling a mandatory settlement conference
12
in this case at the earliest opportunity.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated: October 19, 2017
15
16
17
jone0451.801+sett
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?