Jones v. Kuppinger et al
Filing
137
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/09/18 GRANTING 136 defendant's ex parte request to continue the trial date in this action. The court's order and writ issue 3/29/18 134 and 135 are VACATED. Jury trial will comm ence before the undersigned on 10/29/18 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 26; the estimated length of trial is 3 days. On or before 5/04/18, the parties shall file separate pretrial statements. The court will review the parties pretrial statements on the papers without scheduling a pretrial conference. Plaintiff's motion in limine 129 remains denied as premature. (cc: OTCD)(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HENRY A. JONES,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0451 AC P
Plaintiff,
ORDER and
v.
P. KUPPINGER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
FIRST AMENDED ORDER
SETTING TRIAL AND
FILING OF SEPARATE
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS
16
17
Following issuance of this court’s original Order Setting Trial, ECF No. 134, defense
18
counsel informed the court that he is unable to participate in trial on the originally designated
19
dates (commencing October 22, 2018), due to a conflict previously overlooked when he informed
20
the court of his black-out dates, see ECF No. 136. Defense counsel informs the court that he is
21
available to commence trial the following week, on October 29, 2018, which is also available on
22
the court’s calendar. The following order, and companion writ ad testificandum, are amended
23
accordingly.
24
Plaintiff Henry Jones is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed
25
against defendant correctional officers P. Kuppinger and G. Moore. The action proceeds on
26
plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC). ECF No. 30. Following the partial denial of
27
defendants’ motion for summary judgment on October 20, 2017, this case proceeds on plaintiff’s
28
Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Moore, and Eighth Amendment
1
1
failure to protect claim against both defendants Moore and Kuppinger. See ECF Nos.111, 113.
2
Following an unsuccessful mediation conference on January 9, 2018, ECF No. 119, this case now
3
proceeds to jury trial, see ECF Nos. 30, 48. Additionally, pursuant to the consent of the parties,
4
this action now proceeds pursuant to the authority of the undersigned magistrate judge for all
5
purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). See ECF No. 133.
6
At the court’s direction, defendants filed a statement reflecting the dates they are
7
unavailable for pretrial and trial proceedings, in which they estimate a three-day trial. See ECF
8
No. 131.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s ex parte request to continue the trial date in this action, ECF No. 136, is
GRANTED.
2. The court’s order and writ issued March 29, 2018, ECF Nos. 134 & 135, are
VACATED.
3. Jury trial will commence before the undersigned on Monday, October 29, 2018, at
9:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 26; the estimated length of trial is three days.
4. On or before May 4, 2018, the parties shall file separate Pretrial Statements addressing
each of the matters set forth in Local Rule 281(b).
18
5. The court will review the parties’ Pretrial Statements on the papers, without scheduling
19
a pretrial conference. Thereafter, the court will issue a Pretrial Order providing further directions
20
to the parties, including the deadline for filing in limine motions.
21
22
23
24
25
26
6. Plaintiff’s motion in limine filed March 5, 2018, ECF No. 129, remains denied as
premature.
7. By separate order, the court will issue an amended writ ad testificandum to obtain
plaintiff’s presence at trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 9, 2018
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?