Turner v. Richardson et al

Filing 95

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 08/12/22 ADOPTING 94 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court DECLINES to issue COA. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY TURNER,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-0454 WBS AC P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

WILLIAM MUNIZ, WARDEN,

15

Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

18

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On May 9, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. ECF No. 94. Neither

23

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27
28

1. The findings and recommendations issued May 9, 2022 (ECF No. 94), are ADOPTED
IN FULL;
1

1

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and

2

3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §

3

2253.

4
5

Dated: August 12, 2022

6
7
8
9
10

turn0454.801.hc

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2