Smith v. LaHood
Filing
22
ORDER adopting in full 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/29/14. Defendant's 14 motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's tort claims for defamation and perjury and disability accommodation claim under the Rehabilitation Act are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint that does not include the claims dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Each allegation in the First Amended Complaint shall be separately numbered in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(b). Defendant is granted 30 days to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIANNE SMITH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0471 JAM CKD PS
v.
ORDER
ANTHONY FOXX,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States
17
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
19
On November 22, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 22, 2013 are adopted in full;
27
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is granted;
28
/////
1
1
2
3
3. Plaintiff’s tort claims for defamation and perjury and disability accommodation claim
under the Rehabilitation Act are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
4. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint that does not include the
4
claims dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Each allegation in the First Amended
5
Complaint shall be separately numbered in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
6
10(b); and
7
8
5. Defendant is granted thirty days to respond to the First Amended Complaint.
DATED: January 29, 2014
9
/s/ John A. Mendez______________ ________
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?