Smith v. LaHood
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/2014 ORDERING the plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint by 6/30/2014; ORDERING the defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint by 7/30/2014. (Michel, G)
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2 CHI SOO KIM
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
5
6 Attorneys for Defendant Anthony Foxx
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
MARIANNE SMITH,
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00471 JAM-CKD
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
ANTHONY FOXX, SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Marianne Smith and Defendant Anthony Foxx stipulate to extend the time period for
18 Plaintiff to file her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) from March 3, 2014 to June 30, 2014. Plaintiff
19 will be traveling and unavailable from on or around March 3, 2014 through March 31, 2014, and for part
20 of June 2014. The Court has already granted Defendant thirty days to respond to the FAC. [Dkt 22]
21
22
Plaintiff’s FAC due:
Defendant’s Response to the FAC due:
June 30, 2014
July 30, 2014
23
24
Dated: February 12, 2014
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
25
26
27
/s/ Chi Soo Kim
CHI SOO KIM
Assistant United States Attorney
28
Smith v. Foxx, No. 2:13-cv-00471 JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
1
1
Dated: February 13, 2014
2
/s/ Marianne Smith
MARIANNE SMITH
Plaintiff
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Smith v. Foxx, No. 2:13-cv-00471 JAM-CKD
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?