Smith v. LaHood

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER 26 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/8/2014. Plaintiff to file her First Amended Complaint by 9/2/2014. Defendant's Response to First Amended Complaint is due 10/2/2014. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 CHI SOO KIM Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant Anthony Foxx 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MARIANNE SMITH, CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00471 JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ANTHONY FOXX, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Marianne Smith and Defendant Anthony Foxx stipulate to extend the time period for 18 Plaintiff to file her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) from June 30, 2014 to September 2, 2014. 19 Plaintiff requests this extension due to medical reasons. The Court has already granted Defendant thirty 20 days to respond to the FAC. [Dkt 22] 21 22 Plaintiff’s FAC due: Defendant’s Response to the FAC due: September 2, 2014 October 2, 2014 23 24 Dated: May 7, 2014 25 26 27 /s/ Marianne Smith MARIANNE SMITH Plaintiff 28 Smith v. Foxx, No. 2:13-cv-00471 JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 1 Dated: May 7, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 /s/ Chi Soo Kim CHI SOO KIM Assistant United States Attorney 3 4 5 ORDER 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 Dated: May 8, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Smith v. Foxx, No. 2:13-cv-00471 JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?