Lane v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/20/2013 ORDERING that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff DaDa'Ne Lane's Complaint For Damages against Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al. and all of the claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AYANA K. YOUNG (SBN 261112) LAW OFFICE OF AYANA K. YOUNG 2586 Appian Way Pinole, CA 94564 PH. 510-417-2923 FAX 510-275-9381 Attorney for Plaintiff DaDa’Ne Lane TROY A. VALDEZ, State Bar No. 191478 ERIN M. DOYLE, State Bar No. 233113 VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP 116 New Montgomery Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 202-5950 Facsimile: (415) 202-5951 E-mail: tvaldez@vtdlaw.com Email: edoyle@vtdlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DADA’NE LANE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ) ) MANAGEMENT, LLC and DOES 1-10 ) inclusive, ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 13-cv-00477-JAM-EFB [Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS 040645] STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)A)(ii) AND ORDER Hon. John A. Mendez 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by plaintiff DaDa’Ne Lane (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand, and defendant Comcast 25 Cable Communications Management, LLC (“Defendant"), on the other hand, through their 26 respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its 27 entirety, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. All of Plaintiff’s appeal rights 28 are hereby waived. ____________________________________________________________________________________ - 1 – STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No.: 13-CV-00477-JAM-EFB 1 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant that the Court 2 shall retain jurisdiction over this action following its dismissal for the sole purpose of enforcing 3 the terms of the parties’ confidential settlement agreement. 4 5 DATED: December 20, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF AYANA K. YOUNG 6 By: /s/ Ayana K. Young Ayana K. Young Attorney for DaDa’Ne Lane; Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 DATED: December 20, 2013 VALDEZ TODD & DOYLE LLP By: 11 /s/ Troy A. Valdez Troy A. Valdez 12 Attorneys for Defendant 13 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC. 14 15 16 ORDER 17 Based on the stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 19 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff DaDa’Ne Lane’s Complaint For Damages against Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al. and all of the claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file in this 21 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 23 24 25 Dated: 12/20/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ 26 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________ - 2 – STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No.: 13-CV-00477-JAM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?