Rood v. Swarthout, et al.
Filing
45
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/25/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 6/11/19, in full; and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against all defendants except Hannies, Tan, Fontillas, Hardman, Win, Kiesz, Herhst, and Braunger. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD ROOD,
12
No. 2:13-CV-0478-JAM-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
GARY SWARTHOUT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On June 11, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
23
filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed June 11, 2019, are adopted in full;
2.
Plaintiff’s claims against all defendants except Hannies, Tan, Fontillas,
3
4
5
and
Hardman, Win, Kiesz, Herhst, and Braunger are dismissed.
6
7
8
9
Dated: July 25, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?