Gomez v. Sanders, et al.
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/13/17 GRANTING 62 , 64 , 66 motions for additional time to file a response to defendant's motion for summary judgment and DENYING 63 Motion for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment within 30 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE GOMEZ,
12
No. 2:13-CV-0480-GEB-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SANDERS, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for additional time to file a
19
response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Docs. 62, 64, 66). Good cause appearing
20
therefor, the requests will be granted. Plaintiff may file a response within 30 days of the date of
21
this order.
22
In addition, plaintiff has filed another motion for appointment of counsel (Doc.
23
63). However, it appears this motion crossed in the mail with the court’s denial of his prior
24
request. This second request appears to be the exact same motion, filed a second time. As such,
25
the motion will be denied as duplicative.
26
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
motion for summary judgment (Docs. 62, 64, 66) are granted;
4
5
2.
Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the pending motion for summary
judgment within 30 days from the date of this order; and
6
7
Plaintiff’s motions for additional time to file a response to defendant’s
3.
Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 63) is denied as
duplicative.
8
9
10
11
DATED: December 13, 2017
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?