Fraser, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/2015 DENYING 24 Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time as moot. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRASER ET AL.,

12

No. 2:13-cv-0520 TLN DAD
Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

15

Defendant.

16
Pending before the court is defendant’s January 26, 2015 ex parte application for an order

17
18

shortening time to hear defendant’s motion to compel prior to the close of discovery in this

19

action. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendant’s motion. (Dkt. No. 28.)

20

However, on January 28, 2015, the assigned District Judge issued an order extending the

21

close of discovery to allow the undersigned to hear and rule upon defendant’s motion to compel.

22

(Dkt. No. 31.) Accordingly, defendant’s ex parte application for an order shortening time (Dkt.

23

No. 24) is denied as having been rendered moot. Defendant’s motion to compel will be heard

24

before the undersigned on February 20, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: January 28, 2015

27
28

DAD:6

1

1

Ddad1\orders.civil\fraser0520.ost.den.ord.docx

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2