Durden v. El Dorado County Superior Court
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/13/2013 DISMISSING this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and the Clerk shall enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY FRANCIS DURDEN,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-0535-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT,
15
Respondent.
16
/
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of
19
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge
20
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the
21
action.
22
On May 3, 2013, the court directed petitioner to submit either a completed
23
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the full filing fee for this action within 30
24
days. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack
25
of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. As of July
26
29, 2013, petitioner had not complied and the court directed petitioner to show cause in writing
1
1
within 30 days why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to
2
comply with court rules and orders. More than 30 days have elapsed and petitioner has not
3
responded or resolved the fee status for this case.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
6
7
This action is dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with
court rules and orders; and
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
8
9
10
11
DATED: December 13, 2013
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?