Reese, Jr. v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
53
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/15 ORDERING that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified and expert discovery be extended from 4/30/15 to 5/30/15, for the sole purpose of producing Defense Expert Peter Valentin for deposition. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2
3
4
5
6
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
Taylor W. Rhoan, SBN 294941
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, ZACHARY
ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
Stewart Katz, SBN # 127425
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: (916) 444-5678
LAW OFFICE OF DALE K. GALIPO
Dale K. Galipo, SBN #144074
21800 Burbank Blvd., Suite 310
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
TEL: (818) 347-3333
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT I. REESE, JR.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00559-JAM-DAD
ROBERT I. REESE, JR.,
19
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
EXERT DISCOVERY
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento
County
Sheriff’s
Department
Deputy
DUNCAN
BROWN
(Badge
#1220);
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department
Deputy ZACHARY ROSE (Badge #832);
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department
Sergeant JOSEPH MILLICAN (Badge #246);
and Sacramento County Sheriff SCOTT
JONES.
Defendants.
/
Order entered on: 05/10/2013
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY
{01400000.DOC}
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT REESE
2
and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, ZACHARY
3
ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN, by and through their undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Local Rules
4
143 as follows:
5
1.
The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Pretrial Scheduling
6
Order to extend expert discovery to allow for additional time to conduct depositions of one of
7
Defendants’ expert witnesses, based on good cause appearing as more fully set forth below.
8
2.
Plaintiff agrees to extend the expert discovery deadline and allow Defendants up to and
9
including May 30, 2015, to produce Defense Expert Peter Valentin. The close of discovery deadline is
10
currently April 30, 2015. This extension shall not apply to any other expert or deadline, except as
11
previously ordered for Dr. Bigelow.
12
3.
Good cause exists to extend time due to the Court’s recent order dated March 23, 2015,
13
to allow 10 additional depositions to go forward (Document 45) as well as the availability and
14
scheduling conflicts of experts and counsel. The parties have scheduled 16 depositions in the month of
15
April, including Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, and the depositions of non-retained and retained experts.
16
Only two of which are now unable to move forward prior to the close of discovery due to conflicts. In
17
addition, Counsel has had to travel to San Diego, Chicago, San Francisco, Hayward and now
18
Connecticut in order to take and defend these depositions which has posed an addition challenge in
19
scheduling them all in this limited amount of time. Accommodating Counsel’s schedule, travel, the
20
additional depositions allowed, and the experts’ conflicts and availability have made it difficult, if not
21
impossible to complete all expert depositions prior to April 30, 2015. The parties submit good cause
22
exists to further modify the scheduling order to allow defense expert, Peter Valentin, to be deposed by
23
May 30, 2015.
24
4.
The parties have previously modified discovery and expert disclosure deadlines on four
25
prior occasions by Stipulation and Order on March 5, 2014 (Document 18), June 17, 2014 (Document
26
20), January 5, 2015 (Document 31) and April 17, 2015 (Document 50.) The other deadlines including
27
the dates originally set for trial, pretrial conference and dispositive hearing, as well as the associated
28
deadlines, was previously modified by the Scheduling Order on June 17, 2014 (Document 20.)
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY
{01400000.DOC}
1
2
3
This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be
as valid as an original signature.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: April 30, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ
6
By
7
8
9
Dated: April 30, 2015
/s/ Stewart Katz (as authorized on 4/30/15)
Stewart Katz
Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT REESE
LAW OFFICE OF DALE K. GALIPO
10
By
11
12
13
Dated: April 30, 2015
14
/s/ Dale K. Galipo (as authorized on 4/30/15)
Dale K. Galipo
Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT REESE
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
15
By
16
17
18
19
/s/ John R. Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
Taylor W. Rhoan
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPUTY DUNCAN
BROWN, DEPUTY ZACHARY ROSE, DEPUTY
JOSEPH MILLICAN, and SHERIFF SCOTT JONES
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY
{01400000.DOC}
1
ORDER
2
Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified and expert discovery be extended from
4
5
6
April 30, 2015 to May 30, 2015, for the sole purpose of producing Defense Expert Peter Valentin for
deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: 4/30/2015
9
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY
{01400000.DOC}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?