Reese, Jr. v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 53

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/15 ORDERING that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified and expert discovery be extended from 4/30/15 to 5/30/15, for the sole purpose of producing Defense Expert Peter Valentin for deposition. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 3 4 5 6 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 Taylor W. Rhoan, SBN 294941 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, ZACHARY ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ Stewart Katz, SBN # 127425 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: (916) 444-5678 LAW OFFICE OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, SBN #144074 21800 Burbank Blvd., Suite 310 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 TEL: (818) 347-3333 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT I. REESE, JR. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 Case No.: 2:13-cv-00559-JAM-DAD ROBERT I. REESE, JR., 19 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXERT DISCOVERY 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department Deputy DUNCAN BROWN (Badge #1220); Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department Deputy ZACHARY ROSE (Badge #832); Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department Sergeant JOSEPH MILLICAN (Badge #246); and Sacramento County Sheriff SCOTT JONES. Defendants. / Order entered on: 05/10/2013 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY {01400000.DOC} 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff ROBERT REESE 2 and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, JOSEPH MILLICAN, ZACHARY 3 ROSE, and DUNCAN BROWN, by and through their undersigned Counsel, pursuant to Local Rules 4 143 as follows: 5 1. The parties respectfully request that the District Court modify the Pretrial Scheduling 6 Order to extend expert discovery to allow for additional time to conduct depositions of one of 7 Defendants’ expert witnesses, based on good cause appearing as more fully set forth below. 8 2. Plaintiff agrees to extend the expert discovery deadline and allow Defendants up to and 9 including May 30, 2015, to produce Defense Expert Peter Valentin. The close of discovery deadline is 10 currently April 30, 2015. This extension shall not apply to any other expert or deadline, except as 11 previously ordered for Dr. Bigelow. 12 3. Good cause exists to extend time due to the Court’s recent order dated March 23, 2015, 13 to allow 10 additional depositions to go forward (Document 45) as well as the availability and 14 scheduling conflicts of experts and counsel. The parties have scheduled 16 depositions in the month of 15 April, including Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, and the depositions of non-retained and retained experts. 16 Only two of which are now unable to move forward prior to the close of discovery due to conflicts. In 17 addition, Counsel has had to travel to San Diego, Chicago, San Francisco, Hayward and now 18 Connecticut in order to take and defend these depositions which has posed an addition challenge in 19 scheduling them all in this limited amount of time. Accommodating Counsel’s schedule, travel, the 20 additional depositions allowed, and the experts’ conflicts and availability have made it difficult, if not 21 impossible to complete all expert depositions prior to April 30, 2015. The parties submit good cause 22 exists to further modify the scheduling order to allow defense expert, Peter Valentin, to be deposed by 23 May 30, 2015. 24 4. The parties have previously modified discovery and expert disclosure deadlines on four 25 prior occasions by Stipulation and Order on March 5, 2014 (Document 18), June 17, 2014 (Document 26 20), January 5, 2015 (Document 31) and April 17, 2015 (Document 50.) The other deadlines including 27 the dates originally set for trial, pretrial conference and dispositive hearing, as well as the associated 28 deadlines, was previously modified by the Scheduling Order on June 17, 2014 (Document 20.) 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY {01400000.DOC} 1 2 3 This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and any facsimile or electronic signature shall be as valid as an original signature. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 5 Dated: April 30, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 6 By 7 8 9 Dated: April 30, 2015 /s/ Stewart Katz (as authorized on 4/30/15) Stewart Katz Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT REESE LAW OFFICE OF DALE K. GALIPO 10 By 11 12 13 Dated: April 30, 2015 14 /s/ Dale K. Galipo (as authorized on 4/30/15) Dale K. Galipo Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT REESE PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 15 By 16 17 18 19 /s/ John R. Whitefleet John R. Whitefleet Taylor W. Rhoan Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPUTY DUNCAN BROWN, DEPUTY ZACHARY ROSE, DEPUTY JOSEPH MILLICAN, and SHERIFF SCOTT JONES 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY {01400000.DOC} 1 ORDER 2 Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Order, be modified and expert discovery be extended from 4 5 6 April 30, 2015 to May 30, 2015, for the sole purpose of producing Defense Expert Peter Valentin for deposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 4/30/2015 9 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY {01400000.DOC}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?