Atcherley v. Hanna, et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/10/13 denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying 12 Motion for an expert witness. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILBUR ATCHERLEY,
12
No. 2:13-cv-0576 AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. HANNA, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has also moved
for appointment of expert witnesses. ECF No. 12.
19
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to
20
require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist.
21
Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the
22
voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d
23
1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In
24
the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances because, to date,
25
defendants have not yet appeared in the action. Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel,
26
and the appointment of an expert witness, which seek relief in part based upon the complexity of
27
the issues to be raised at trial or in a summary judgment motion, are accordingly premature. The
28
Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel and for appointment of an expert witness will
1
1
therefore be denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the proceeding.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the
3
appointment of counsel (ECF No. 11) and for appointment of an expert witness (ECF No. 12) are
4
denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage in the proceedings.
5
DATED: June 10, 2013
6
`
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
AC:rb
9
atch0576.31
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?