McMillan v. Pfile, et al.
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/31/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 55 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 49 Motion to Dismiss as to claims 1 and 2 against Defendant Zuniga, claim 3 against Defendant Ringler and claim 9 against Defendant Scotland; GRANTING 49 Motion to Dismiss in all other respects. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWIN MCMILLAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0578 MCE KJN P
v.
ORDER
S. RINGLER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 1, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff and defendants
23
have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 1, 2016 are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49) is denied as to claims 1 and 2 against
4
defendant Zuniga, claim 3 against defendant Ringler and claim 9 as to defendant Scotland;
5
defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in all other respects.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 31, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?