McMillan v. Pfile, et al.

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/23/2016 GRANTING Defendants' 72 Motion for Extension. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 28, 29, and 30-33, as modified by the Court's Order (ECF No. 70), is EXTENDED through 1/19/2017. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWIN MCMILLAN, 12 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 13-cv-00578-MCE-KJN (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL S. RINGLER, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Application For Extension of Time to Comply 18 19 With Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 that: 21 1. The application (ECF No. 72) is granted; and 22 2. Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 28, 29, 23 and 30-33, as modified by the Court’s Order (ECF No. 70), is extended through January 19, 2017. 24 Dated: December 23, 2016 25 26 27 28 /mcmi0578.ext

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?