United States of America v. Abernathy et al

Filing 65

JUDGMENT signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on *11/4/2014* 11/4/2014 ENTERING JUDGMENT in favor of United States against Defendant Harvey M. Abernathy, individually, in the amount of $1,110,957.70, for unpaid federal trust fund recovery penalty liabilities for the tax periods ending 9/30/2000, 12/31/2000, 3/31/2001 and 6/30/2001, plus additional interest accruing from 12/31/2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621; FINDING that the United States has valid fede ral tax liens for the unpaid federal trust fund recovery penalty assessments at issue in this action, being $1,110,957.70 as of 12/31/2013, for the tax periods ending 9/30/2000, 12/31/2000, 3/31/2001 and 6/30/2001, plus additional interest pursu ant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621 accruing from 12/31/2013, against all property and rights to property belonging to Harvey M. Abernathy; ATTACHING said tax liens to three-quarters (3/4) of the property located at 9472 Black swain Place, Stockton, CA 95219, situated in the County of San Joaquin, State of California (the "Blackswain Property") representing Defendant Harvey M. Abernathy's interest as individual property or community property of Harvey M. Abe rnathy and Julie D. Abernathy; ORDERING that said tax liens not attach to one-quarter (1/4) of the value of the Blackswain Property representing Defendant Julie D. Abernathy's individual property; ADJUDGING that Defendants Livingston & Mattesich Law Corp. and San Joaquin County have no interest in the Blackswain Property; ADJUDGING that Defendants State of California Employment Development Department, Superior Electric Supply Co. a division of Rose Electric Supply, Inc., and Colorado Compen sation Authority aka Pinnacol Assurance, have no interest in the Blackswain Property; ORDERING that this Court retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement; CAUTIONING all parties that the United States is ent itled to enforce its federal tax liens against the portion of the Blackswain Property to which its tax liens attach by selling the Blackswain Property under 28 U.S.C. § 2001, pursuant to further order of this Court on any Motion for Entry of an Order for Sale filed by the United States, with Julie D. Abernathy retaining the right to her one-quarter (1/4) interest in the proceeds of such sale subject to any liens that also attach to her one-quarter (1/4) interest. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HARVEY M. ABERNATHY; JULIE D. ) ABERNATHY; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT ) DEPARTMENT; LIVINGSTON & ) MATTESICH LAW CORP.; SUPERIOR ) ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. a division of ) ROSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC.; ) COLORADO COMPENSATION ) INSURANCE AUTHORITY AKA ) PINNACOL ASSURANCE; and SAN ) JOAQUIN COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No. 2:13-cv-00590-KJM-DAD JUDGMENT Pursuant to the stipulations of the United States of America, Harvey M. Abernathy and 21 Julie D. Abernathy, the stipulated disclaimers of interest at Docket Numbers 4 and 5, and the 22 Motion for Default Judgment filed by the United States, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as 23 follows: Judgment (Case No. 2:13-cv-00590-KJM-DAD) 1 1 1. Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Defendant Harvey 2 M. Abernathy, individually, in the amount of $1,110,957.70, for unpaid federal trust fund 3 recovery penalty liabilities for the tax periods ending September 30, 2000, December 31, 2000, 4 March 31, 2001 and June 30, 2001, plus additional interest accruing from December 31, 2013, 5 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621; 6 2. The United States has valid federal tax liens for the unpaid federal trust fund 7 recovery penalty assessments at issue in this action, being $1,110,957.70 as of December 31, 8 2013, for the tax periods ending September 30, 2000, December 31, 2000, March 31, 2001 and 9 June 30, 2001, plus additional interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621 10 accruing from December 31, 2013, against all property and rights to property belonging to 11 Harvey M. Abernathy; 12 3. The tax liens referred to in paragraph 2 above attach to Harvey M. Abernathy’s 13 interest in the real property located at 9472 Blackswain Place, Stockton, CA 95219, situated in 14 the County of San Joaquin, State of California (the “Blackswain Property”), which is more 15 particularly described as follows: 16 17 All that portion of Lot 2 as shown on the plat of the Twin Creeks Estate Unit No. 1 filed in Book of Maps and Plats, Vol. 30, Page 25, San Joaquin County Records, a portion of Section 7, Township 2 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: 18 19 20 21 Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 2 on the Southerly right of way line of Otto Drive as shown on said plat; thence along said right of way line 65.93 feet along the arc of a 4553.10 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 00̊ 49' 47" subtended by a chord which bears North 79̊ 18' 36" East 65.93 feet; thence South 10̊ 35' 37" East 107.01 feet to the Northerly right of way line of Blackswain Place as shown on said plat; thence along the right of way line of said place, the following two courses: 22 1) 23 23.70 feet along the arc of a 50.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 27̊ 09' 10" subtended by a chord which bears North 79̊ 19' 59" West 23.47 feet; Judgment (Case No. 2:13-cv-00590-KJM-DAD) 2 1 2) 2 30.48 feet along the arc of a 47.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle 37̊ 39' 02" subtended by a chord which bears North 84̊ 19' 37" West 29.94 feet; thence North 20̊ 14' 36" West 91.29 feet to the point of beginning. 3 4 NOTE: Said property is also known as Parcel One as shown on that certain record survey filed for record July 3, 1990 in Book of Surveys, Book 31, Page 65, San Joaquin County Records. 5 6 4. The tax liens referred to in paragraph 2 above, attach to three-quarters (3/4) of the 7 value of the Blackswain Property, which three-quarters (3/4) is either Harvey M. Abernathy’s 8 individual property or community property of Harvey M. Abernathy and Julie D. Abernathy, and 9 the tax liens do not attach to one-quarter (1/4) of the value of the Blackswain Property, which 10 11 one-quarter (1/4) is Julie D. Abernathy’s individual property. 5. Pursuant to the Stipulated Disclaimers of Interest (Docket Nos. 4 & 5), it is 12 ADJUDGED that Defendants Livingston & Mattesich Law Corp. and San Joaquin County have 13 no interest in the Blackswain Property. 14 6. Pursuant to the order on the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment, it is 15 ADJUDGED that Defendants State of California Employment Development Department, 16 Superior Electric Supply Co. a division of Rose Electric Supply, Inc., and Colorado 17 Compensation Authority aka Pinnacol Assurance, have no interest in the Blackswain Property. 18 7. This Court retains jurisdiction over this action to enforce the terms of the 19 settlement agreement. If necessary, the United States is entitled to enforce its federal tax liens 20 against the portion of the Blackswain Property to which its tax liens attach by selling the 21 Blackswain Property under 28 U.S.C. § 2001, pursuant to further order of this Court, with Julie 22 D. Abernathy retaining the right to her one-quarter interest in the proceeds of such sale subject to 23 Judgment (Case No. 2:13-cv-00590-KJM-DAD) 3 1 any liens that also attach to her one-quarter interest. The United States may do so by filing a 2 motion for entry of an Order of Sale in this action. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: November 4, 2014. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Judgment (Case No. 2:13-cv-00590-KJM-DAD) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?