(PC) Jenkins v. Barnes, et al.
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/2014 ORDERING #24 Motion for photocopies and #25 Motion for Extension of time are both DENIED as MOOT. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-0596 AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
RON BARNES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2014, this court ordered Defendant Miranda
19
to be served with a copy of the second amended complaint (pages 1-31) as a one time courtesy to
20
plaintiff since he had not returned a copy of the 536 page amended complaint. Accordingly,
21
plaintiff’s motion for a thirty day extension of time as well as a motion for copies of the second
22
amended complaint are both denied as moot. ECF Nos. 24, 25.
23
To the extent that plaintiff did not understand this court’s March 17, 2014 order, the
24
undersigned will clarify the status of this case. The one time courtesy copy of the second
25
amended complaint referenced in the March 17, 2014 order was not to be provided to plaintiff. It
26
was photocopied by the court and provided to the United States Marshal in order to effect service
27
of process on Defendant Miranda. Therefore, plaintiff need not provide any additional documents
28
to the court at this time.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time
2
(ECF No. 25) and motion for photocopies (ECF No. 24) are both denied as moot.
3
DATED: April 30, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?