Jenkins v. Barnes, et al.

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/2014 ORDERING 24 Motion for photocopies and 25 Motion for Extension of time are both DENIED as MOOT. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT LEE JENKINS, JR., 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-0596 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RON BARNES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2014, this court ordered Defendant Miranda 19 to be served with a copy of the second amended complaint (pages 1-31) as a one time courtesy to 20 plaintiff since he had not returned a copy of the 536 page amended complaint. Accordingly, 21 plaintiff’s motion for a thirty day extension of time as well as a motion for copies of the second 22 amended complaint are both denied as moot. ECF Nos. 24, 25. 23 To the extent that plaintiff did not understand this court’s March 17, 2014 order, the 24 undersigned will clarify the status of this case. The one time courtesy copy of the second 25 amended complaint referenced in the March 17, 2014 order was not to be provided to plaintiff. It 26 was photocopied by the court and provided to the United States Marshal in order to effect service 27 of process on Defendant Miranda. Therefore, plaintiff need not provide any additional documents 28 to the court at this time. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time 2 (ECF No. 25) and motion for photocopies (ECF No. 24) are both denied as moot. 3 DATED: April 30, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?