Marzetta v. Comcast

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/21/14 ORDERING that the defendants' deadline to serve rebuttal expert disclosure is extended to 4/21/14. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP GARY T. LAFAYETTE (SBN 088666) SUSAN T. KUMAGAI (SBN 127667) BRIAN H. CHUN (SBN 215417) 100 Spear Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 357-4600 Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 7 8 9 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105 (415) 357-4600 FAX (415) 357-4605 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 11 12 13 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN DANZ STEPHEN DANZ (SBN 68318) 11661 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 95816 Telephone: (877) 789-9707 Facsimile: (877) 789-9707 LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS E. JAFFE DOUGLAS E. JAFFE (SBN 88758) P.O. Box 160661 Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 381-2011 Facsimile: (916) 920-0355 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff LA CHANDRA MARZETTA 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 LA CHANDRA MARZETTA, 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 COMCAST, a Corporation and DOES 1100, 24 25 Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD 1 1 2 STIPULATION Plaintiff La Chandra Marzetta (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comcast Cable 3 Communications Management, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) jointly submit 4 this stipulated request to extend Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: 5 WHEREAS on January 31, 2014, Plaintiff served her Initial Expert Disclosure, which 6 7 8 9 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105 (415) 357-4600 FAX (415) 357-4605 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 11 12 13 14 disclosed one retained expert; WHEREAS on March 7, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendant with her retained expert’s expert report; WHEREAS Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure is April 7, 2014; WHEREAS Defendant’s rebuttal expert’s research assistant is currently on vacation and will not return until March 28, 2014; and WHEREAS Defendant’s rebuttal expert will be on vacation from March 29, 2014 to April 6, 2014; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties through 15 their respective attorneys of records that Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert 16 Disclosure be extended to April 21, 2014. 17 18 DATED: March 20, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS E. JAFFE 19 /s/ Douglas E. Jaffe DOUGLAS E. JAFFE Attorneys for Plaintiff LA CHANDRA MARZETTA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: March 20, 2014 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP /s/ Brian H. Chun BRIAN H. CHUN Attorneys for Defendant COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD 2 1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 2 I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Douglas E. Jaffe, counsel for 3 Plaintiff, for the filing of this Stipulated Request to Extend Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert 4 Disclosure Deadline and [Proposed] Order. /s/ Brian H. Chun BRIAN H. CHUN 5 6 7 8 9 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure is extended to April 21, 2014. Dated: March 21, 2014 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105 (415) 357-4600 FAX (415) 357-4605 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?