Marzetta v. Comcast
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/21/14 ORDERING that the defendants' deadline to serve rebuttal expert disclosure is extended to 4/21/14. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
GARY T. LAFAYETTE (SBN 088666)
SUSAN T. KUMAGAI (SBN 127667)
BRIAN H. CHUN (SBN 215417)
100 Spear Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 357-4600
Facsimile: (415) 357-4605
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC
7
8
9
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105
(415) 357-4600
FAX (415) 357-4605
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
12
13
LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN DANZ
STEPHEN DANZ (SBN 68318)
11661 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 95816
Telephone: (877) 789-9707
Facsimile: (877) 789-9707
LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS E. JAFFE
DOUGLAS E. JAFFE (SBN 88758)
P.O. Box 160661
Sacramento, California 95816
Telephone: (916) 381-2011
Facsimile: (916) 920-0355
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LA CHANDRA MARZETTA
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
LA CHANDRA MARZETTA,
21
Plaintiff,
22
vs.
23
COMCAST, a Corporation and DOES 1100,
24
25
Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S
REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE
DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT
DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD
1
1
2
STIPULATION
Plaintiff La Chandra Marzetta (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Comcast Cable
3
Communications Management, LLC (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) jointly submit
4
this stipulated request to extend Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure:
5
WHEREAS on January 31, 2014, Plaintiff served her Initial Expert Disclosure, which
6
7
8
9
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105
(415) 357-4600
FAX (415) 357-4605
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
12
13
14
disclosed one retained expert;
WHEREAS on March 7, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendant with her retained expert’s
expert report;
WHEREAS Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure is April 7, 2014;
WHEREAS Defendant’s rebuttal expert’s research assistant is currently on vacation and
will not return until March 28, 2014; and
WHEREAS Defendant’s rebuttal expert will be on vacation from March 29, 2014 to April
6, 2014;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties through
15
their respective attorneys of records that Defendant’s deadline to serve its Rebuttal Expert
16
Disclosure be extended to April 21, 2014.
17
18
DATED: March 20, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS E. JAFFE
19
/s/ Douglas E. Jaffe
DOUGLAS E. JAFFE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LA CHANDRA MARZETTA
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: March 20, 2014
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
/s/ Brian H. Chun
BRIAN H. CHUN
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT
DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD
2
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2
I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Douglas E. Jaffe, counsel for
3
Plaintiff, for the filing of this Stipulated Request to Extend Defendant’s Rebuttal Expert
4
Disclosure Deadline and [Proposed] Order.
/s/ Brian H. Chun
BRIAN H. CHUN
5
6
7
8
9
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to
serve its Rebuttal Expert Disclosure is extended to April 21, 2014.
Dated: March 21, 2014
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
100 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 400
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF ORNIA 94105
(415) 357-4600
FAX (415) 357-4605
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S REBUTTAL EXPERT
DISCLOSURE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 2:13-CV-00598-GEB-DAD
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?