Pilby v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/3/2013 DISMISSING CASE, in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1); ORDERING that each party bear their own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ROBERT P. HENK (147490)
SHERI L. LEONARD (173544)
HENKLEONARD
A Professional Law Corporation
2260 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 787-4544
Fax:
(916) 787-4530
Email:
henkleonard@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JEFF PILBY
Kathleen Cahill Slaught (168129)
Michelle M. Scannell (267767)
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
Fax:
(415) 397-8549
Email: kslaught@seyfarth.com
mscannell@seyfarth.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
17
18
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
JEFF PILBY,
22
vs.
13 CV 00603 MCE EFB
Plaintiff,
23
CASE NO.:
24
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY and
DOES 1 through 5, inclusive,
26
Defendant.
27
28
29
///
1
.
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiff and Defendant, through their
designated counsel of record, that this case be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant
to FRCP 41(a)(1), each party to bear their own fees and costs.
4
5
6
7
Dated: May 1, 2013
HENK LEONARD
8
A Professional Law Corporation
9
/s/SHERI L. LEONARD
SHERI L. LEONARD
Attorney for Plaintiff
JEFF PILBY
10
11
12
13
14
Dated: May 1, 2013
15
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
/s/KATHLEEN CAHILL SLAUGHT( as auth.on5/1/13)
KATHLEEN CAHILL SLAUGHT
MICHELLE M. SCANNELL
Attorney for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
16
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 3, 2013
22
23
24
25
___________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
26
27
28
29
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?