HSBC Bank USA et al v. Renner et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/24/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 10 Findings and Recommendations; REMANDING CASE to Amador County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
SEMT 2007-2, BY WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.,

12
Plaintiff,

13
vs.

14
15

Case No. 2:13-cv-0608 KJM DAD PS

RANDALL J. RENNER;
ROSEMARY L. RENNER,

ORDER

16
Defendants.

17

/

18

Defendants are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was

19
20

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On April 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,

21
22

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

23

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and

24

recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the

25

findings and recommendations.

26

/////
1

1

Although it appears from the docket that defendants’ copies of the findings and

2

recommendations were returned as undeliverable and unable to be forwarded, defendants were

3

properly served. It is the defendants’ responsibility to keep the court apprised of their current

4

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

5

the party is fully effective.

6

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

7

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

8

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

9

1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

10

be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

11

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

12

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2013 (Doc. No. 10) are

13

adopted in full;

14

2. This action is summarily remanded to the Amador County Superior Court; and

15

3. This case is closed.

16

DATED: June 24, 2013.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2