HSBC Bank USA et al v. Renner et al

Filing 4

ORDER To Transfer Case To The Sacramento Division Of The Eastern District Of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/28/2013. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 HSBC BANK USA, et al., 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) RANDALL J. RENNER, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) _____________________________________ ) Case No.: 1:13-cv-00450-LJO-SKO ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 On March 28, 2013, Defendant Randall J. Renner ("Defendant") filed a Notice of Removal, 17 removing an unlawful detainer action from the Amador County Superior Court for claims related 18 to Defendant's alleged residence at real property located at 16294 Rossbridge Road, Jackson, 19 California 95642, which is located in Amador County. (See Doc. 1, pp. 6-9.) 20 Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 pertains to venue in general and states in pertinent part that "[a] 21 civil action may be brought in . . . judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or 22 omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the 23 action is situated." 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391(b)(2). 24 Here, the claims concern real property located in Amador County, California. Pursuant to 25 the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Rule 120(d), "[a]ll 26 civil and criminal actions and proceedings of every nature and kind cognizable" arising in Amador 27 County "shall be commenced in the United States District Court sitting in Sacramento, California." 28 1 Thus, Defendant should have removed this action to the Sacramento Division of the United States 2 District Court, Eastern District of California, not the Fresno Division. 3 Local Rule 120(f) provides that a civil action that has not been commenced in the proper 4 division of the Court may, on the Court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 5 Court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division of the Court.1 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California in Sacramento; 9 2. The Clerk of the Court shall assign a new case number; and 10 3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at: 11 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 I Street Sacramento, California, 95814 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: ie14hj March 28, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 The Court takes no position on whether the removal was proper or whether subject matter jurisdiction lies in a federal court. As such, the Court also takes no action with respect to Defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?