Ortiz v. California Deparment of Corrections et al
Filing
24
ORDER denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/13/14: Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days from the date this Order is signed in which to file a second amended complaint that complies with the August 26, 2014 order. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSUE ORTIZ,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:13-cv-0617 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
On August 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint
18
with leave to amend. On September 29, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that
19
order. Plaintiff signed the request on September 24, 2014. See Huizar v. Carey, 273 F.3d 1220,
20
1222 (9th Cir. 2001) (Under the mailbox rule, a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is “deemed filed
21
when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing to the relevant court.”); Houston v. Lack,
22
487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
23
Local Rule 303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no
24
reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service
25
of the ruling on the parties.” Id. Thus, plaintiff’s request was due on or before September 9,
26
2014. Therefore, plaintiff’s September 24, 2014 request for reconsideration of the magistrate
27
judge’s order of August 26, 2014, is untimely. Good cause appearing, plaintiff is granted an
28
additional thirty days in which to file a second amended complaint.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (ECF No. 23) is denied; and
3
2. Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days from the date this Order is signed in which
4
to file a second amended complaint that complies with the August 26, 2014 order.
5
Dated: November 13, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
11
/orti0617.851
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?