Ortiz v. California Deparment of Corrections et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/13/14: Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days from the date this Order is signed in which to file a second amended complaint that complies with the August 26, 2014 order. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSUE ORTIZ, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:13-cv-0617 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. On August 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint 18 with leave to amend. On September 29, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that 19 order. Plaintiff signed the request on September 24, 2014. See Huizar v. Carey, 273 F.3d 1220, 20 1222 (9th Cir. 2001) (Under the mailbox rule, a prisoner’s pro se habeas petition is “deemed filed 21 when he hands it over to prison authorities for mailing to the relevant court.”); Houston v. Lack, 22 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 23 Local Rule 303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no 24 reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service 25 of the ruling on the parties.” Id. Thus, plaintiff’s request was due on or before September 9, 26 2014. Therefore, plaintiff’s September 24, 2014 request for reconsideration of the magistrate 27 judge’s order of August 26, 2014, is untimely. Good cause appearing, plaintiff is granted an 28 additional thirty days in which to file a second amended complaint. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (ECF No. 23) is denied; and 3 2. Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days from the date this Order is signed in which 4 to file a second amended complaint that complies with the August 26, 2014 order. 5 Dated: November 13, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 11 /orti0617.851 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?