Stimac v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al.
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/11/2013 GRANTING 6 Motion to Remand; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Butte; VACATING all dates in this matter. CASE CLOSED. Copy of remand order sent to other court. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
24
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK NA,
)
)
Successor to WORLD SAVINGS
)
BANK, FSB, AND WACHOVIA
)
)
CORPORATION, FSB, CAL
)
WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
)
CORPORATION and DOES 1 through )
)
50 inclusive.
)
)
)
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
LORRIE ELLEN STIMAC, AN
INDIVIDUAL
CASE NO. 2:13-CV00619-LKK-CMK
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO REMAND
(Removed from the Superior Court of
Butte County, Case No. 158849
Action Filed on January 31, 2013
Hearing Date: June 17, 2013
Time:
10:00AM
Courtroom: 4, 15th Floor
PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND - 1
1
The Court, having considered the documents on file and all other matters
2
presented, including defendants’ Statement of Non-opposition, rules that
3
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
4
1447(c), this action is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of
5
California, County of Butte. All dates in this matter are VACATED, and the Clerk
6
is directed to close this case.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
DATED: June 11, 2013
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?