Stimac v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al.

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/11/2013 GRANTING 6 Motion to Remand; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Butte; VACATING all dates in this matter. CASE CLOSED. Copy of remand order sent to other court. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 24 ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK NA, ) ) Successor to WORLD SAVINGS ) BANK, FSB, AND WACHOVIA ) ) CORPORATION, FSB, CAL ) WESTERN RECONVEYANCE ) CORPORATION and DOES 1 through ) ) 50 inclusive. ) ) ) Defendants ) ) ) ) ) 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 LORRIE ELLEN STIMAC, AN INDIVIDUAL CASE NO. 2:13-CV00619-LKK-CMK ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND (Removed from the Superior Court of Butte County, Case No. 158849 Action Filed on January 31, 2013 Hearing Date: June 17, 2013 Time: 10:00AM Courtroom: 4, 15th Floor PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND - 1 1 The Court, having considered the documents on file and all other matters 2 presented, including defendants’ Statement of Non-opposition, rules that 3 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 4 1447(c), this action is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of 5 California, County of Butte. All dates in this matter are VACATED, and the Clerk 6 is directed to close this case. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED: June 11, 2013 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?